What are the potential implications of a country's military actions on global diplomacy and security?
Not content with the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Donald Trump spoke to reporters on Air Force One and appeared to spell out the countries now in his line of sight. Colombia is "very sick", according to President Trump. Iran will get "hit very hard" if it kills anti-government protestors. Cuba is "ready to fall", he declared. And, in words that have sparked concern across Europe, he repeatedly declared that America "needs Greenland" from a national security perspective, and that Denmark is incapable of defending it properly. It seems something of a damascene conversion from Trump, who was elected on the promise of no more foreign wars. And, given the intervention in Caracas went smoothly, what's to think he will stop there? Does this mark a profound shift in the international order? Could America seriously annexe territory from a fellow NATO member? And how should Keir Starmer and other European allies react to such a remarkable change in approach? The News Agents is hsbc.co.uk/
您的投票很重要
无需账号。您的投票会被保存并计入共识分析。 创建账号即可保存您的投票记录。
翻译待处理
翻译待处理
翻译待处理
翻译待处理
翻译待处理
翻译待处理
翻译待处理
翻译待处理
翻译待处理
翻译待处理
💡 使用说明
- • 添加陈述: 发布观点或问题(10 至 500 个字符)。
- • 投票: 对每条陈述选择同意、不同意或不确定。
- • 回应: 附上证据,详细阐述支持或反对的理由。
- • 共识: 参与人数足够后,分析会显示各意见群体及其共识所在。
Society Speaks 开放且独立。 您的支持让公民讨论远离广告和商业影响。
支持我们