انتقل إلى المحتوى الرئيسي
الترجمة جارية — يُعرض هذا المحتوى باللغة الإنجليزية أثناء إعداد نسختك بلغتك.

Michael Kratsios: Trump's Science Agenda, Anti-Science Claims, Fauci's Damage, DEI & China

Politics
United States
بدأ في August 25, 2026

(0:00) Michael Kratsios joins the show! (01:56) Is this administration anti-science? The Nature poll, DEI grants, and $8B down the drain (8:16) Climate science cuts: RCP 8.5 gets pulled and the "climate emergency" narrative collapses (13:45) $47B at NIH, Eroom's Law, and golden tickets: has American science stagnated? (22:24) Big bold bets: Genesis Mission, quantum by 2028, fusion by 2035, boots on the moon in '28 (34:04) The great race with China: $33B to $670B, and 7 out of 10 STEM PhDs are...

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 تصريحات للتصويت • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Aug 25, 2026
The NIH's budget of $47 billion should be carefully evaluated to ensure it effectively advances public health.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Aug 25, 2026
Science funding should prioritize projects with demonstrable societal benefits rather than speculative ventures.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Aug 25, 2026
Engaging diverse communities in scientific research leads to more holistic and effective solutions to global challenges.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Aug 25, 2026
American science is experiencing stagnation despite high funding levels, indicating a need for reform in research practices.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Aug 25, 2026
The Trump administration's science agenda has prioritized economic interests over scientific integrity.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Aug 25, 2026
The future of American leadership in science and technology relies on collaboration with international partners, including China.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Aug 25, 2026
To advance its science agenda, the U.S. must balance innovation with ethical considerations and public accountability.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Aug 25, 2026
DEI grants in science funding are essential for fostering diverse perspectives and innovation.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Aug 25, 2026
The race with China in STEM fields necessitates increased investment in education and research in the United States.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Aug 25, 2026
The portrayal of a 'climate emergency' is exaggerated and undermines public trust in scientific discourse.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us