주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기
번역 진행 중 — 귀하의 언어 버전을 준비하는 동안 이 콘텐츠가 영어로 표시됩니다.
토론으로 돌아가기

The Download: our 35 Innovators Under 35 this year

Technology
글로벌
September 09, 2026에 시작됨

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. Introducing our 35 Innovators Under 35 list for 2026 What will the next generation of science and technology look like? Our latest Innovators Under 35 list offers a glimpse. Every year,…

출처 기사

진술 추가 분석 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 투표할 진술 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Sep 09, 2026
The list should track long-term impact of past honorees, publishing whether their recognised work actually changed their fields or the world.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: admin • Sep 09, 2026
The list should include innovators from non-Western countries at proportions matching global population and research output.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: admin • Sep 09, 2026
The focus on youth in the Innovators Under 35 list promotes ageism by undervaluing older innovators.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: admin • Sep 09, 2026
Recognising innovators under 35 is vital because radical breakthroughs often come from people without institutional inertia.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: admin • Sep 09, 2026
Innovations listed should be evaluated on potential societal benefit, not market size or venture capital interest.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: admin • Sep 09, 2026
The criteria for selecting Innovators Under 35 should prioritize impact over age.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: admin • Sep 09, 2026
The Innovators Under 35 list should include more voices from marginalized communities to ensure a broader perspective on innovation.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: admin • Sep 09, 2026
The Innovators Under 35 list overlooks significant contributions from established experts in the field.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: admin • Sep 09, 2026
The Innovators Under 35 list fails to adequately represent the global diversity of innovation outside the West.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: admin • Sep 09, 2026
The Innovators Under 35 list should openly name the selection criteria and judges, allowing public scrutiny of who gets recognised.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us