Skip to main content
번역 진행 중 — 귀하의 언어 버전을 준비하는 동안 이 콘텐츠가 영어로 표시됩니다.
Back to Discussions

Wednesday assorted links

Culture
Global
Started January 29, 2026

1. Some Kevin Grier biohistory (for the bots?). 2. Andrej. 3. Joshua Rothman on the new Knausgaard cycle (New Yorker). 4. New Substack and podcast Ideas in Development. 5. “Introducing Prism, a free workspace for scientists to write and collaborate on research, 2.” 6. Art De Vany, RIP. 7. “Indische Beschäftigte verdienen weiterhin […] The post Wednesday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsAnyone who thinks that big corporate media isn't just shilling . by Action Figu...

Source Articles

진술 추가 분석 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 투표할 진술 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 게시자: will • Jan 29, 2026
The rise of Substack and similar platforms reflects a shift in how we consume and engage with intellectual discourse, raising questions about quality versus accessibility.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Jan 29, 2026
Relying on free platforms like Prism could undermine traditional publishing models that ensure rigorous peer review and academic integrity.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Jan 29, 2026
The introduction of tools like Prism is essential for enhancing collaboration in scientific research and democratizing access to knowledge.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Jan 29, 2026
The passing of Art De Vany highlights the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in economics, which should be celebrated and further integrated into mainstream education.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Jan 29, 2026
Joshua Rothman's analysis of Knausgaard’s work may perpetuate elitism in literature, sidelining diverse voices that deserve equal attention.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us