Skip to main content

Developing a Risk-Scoring Tool for Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Biological Design

Technology
Global
Started February 12, 2026

A rise in artificial intelligence (AI) use in biology has driven transformative developments but could also pose dual-use risks. This report presents a multifaceted scoring system to assess the risks of using AI to modify select viral capabilities

🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will Feb 12, 2026
AI's potential to enhance agricultural productivity through biological design could address food security challenges globally.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 12, 2026
Implementing a risk-scoring tool for AI in biological design may help balance innovation with safety, fostering responsible research practices.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 12, 2026
AI-driven biological design can lead to breakthroughs in medicine, enhancing our ability to combat diseases and improve public health.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 12, 2026
The unpredictability of AI outcomes in modifying viral capabilities raises ethical concerns that we cannot afford to ignore.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 12, 2026
The dual-use risks of AI in biology could lead to bioweapons development, necessitating strict regulations and oversight to prevent misuse.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement