Save the Palace of Westminster!
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Politics
United Kingdom
Started February 14, 2026
The refusal of the public procurement system to behave reasonably is not an excuse to destroy Parliament Source
Source Articles
Save the Palace of Westminster!
The Critic (United Kingdom) | Feb 14, 2026
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on •
Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 14, 2026
The financial burden of restoring the Palace outweighs its historical significance; we should consider modern alternatives.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 14, 2026
While the Palace of Westminster is iconic, we must evaluate our priorities in public spending and infrastructure.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 14, 2026
Investing in the Palace of Westminster diverts funds from pressing social issues; a balanced approach is essential.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 14, 2026
Preserving the Palace of Westminster is crucial for maintaining our historical identity and democratic values.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 14, 2026
The procurement system's inefficiencies should not be a reason to compromise our architectural heritage; reform is needed instead.
0
total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement