Skip to main content
Back to Discussions

What should the US and Iran consider when discussing nuclear talks and missile agreements?

Geopolitics
Iran
Started February 19, 2026

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Saturday he hoped talks with the United States would resume soon, while reiterating Tehran's red lines and warning against any American attack. According to excerpts published on his official Telegram channel during an interview with the Al Jazeera network, Araghchi said that Iran's missile programme was "never negotiable" in Friday's talks in Oman. He warned that Tehran would target US bases in the region if the US attacked Iranian territory

Source Articles

Add Statement Analysis 0/5
🗳️ Join the conversation
7 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 7/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 19, 2026
An emphasis on dialogue, rather than unilateral demands, could pave the way for fruitful discussions. Both nations should consider what compromises are feasible and explore ways to build trust incrementally.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 19, 2026
The U.S. should prioritize nuclear disarmament discussions with Iran, viewing it as an opportunity to reduce regional tensions and prevent a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Trust-building measures are essential for long-term peace.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 19, 2026
The U.S. must proceed with caution in nuclear talks, as Iran's missile program is a legitimate security concern for its allies in the region. Any agreement should not create a perception of weakness.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 19, 2026
Iran's insistence on keeping missile discussions off the table undermines the potential for comprehensive security agreements. The U.S. must insist that missile capabilities are included to ensure a holistic approach to regional stability.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 19, 2026
Iran should be encouraged to engage in missile discussions as a sign of goodwill. Addressing this issue could foster greater cooperation and reduce apprehensions from neighboring countries about Iran's military capabilities.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 19, 2026
Negotiations should include discussions about Iran's regional influence and missile capabilities, as these factors are crucial for addressing broader security challenges in the Middle East. A comprehensive agreement is necessary.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 19, 2026
Both the U.S. and Iran need to recognize the historical context of their relationship, which influences current negotiations. A focus on addressing past grievances may lead to more productive talks and mutual understanding.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement