Skip to main content

Colin McGinn’s “My Honest Views”

Culture
United States
Started February 20, 2026

I think David Lewis was off his rocker, I think Donald Davidson was far too impressed by elementary logic and decision theory, I think Willard Quine was a mediocre logician with some philosophical side-interests, I think Daniel Dennett never understood philosophy, I think Michael Dummett was a dimwit outside of his narrow specializations, I think […] The post Colin McGinn’s “My Honest Views” appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to nigel. Who cares? Why are you so concerned ...

Source Articles

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will Feb 20, 2026
McGinn's dismissive views on influential thinkers undermine the collaborative nature of philosophy and stifle constructive discourse.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 20, 2026
Colin McGinn's candid critiques of prominent philosophers challenge the status quo and encourage deeper exploration of philosophical ideas.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 20, 2026
Philosophical debates thrive on diverse opinions; McGinn's harsh judgments might invigorate discussions among scholars.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 20, 2026
Engaging with McGinn's assessments of philosophers like Davidson and Quine can reveal the subjective nature of philosophical evaluation.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 20, 2026
McGinn's perspective risks alienating those who find value in the works of philosophers he criticizes, limiting inclusive dialogue.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us