The China panic and the Indian fact
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Geopolitics
Global
Started February 23, 2026
The debate over the Chagos Islands has been clouded by fantasy about Beijing, obscuring the far more consequential role of New Delhi Source
Source Articles
The China panic and the Indian fact
The Critic (United Kingdom) | Feb 23, 2026
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on •
Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 23, 2026
India's historical claims to the Chagos Islands deserve more attention than the speculative fears surrounding China's ambitions.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 23, 2026
Both India and China play critical roles in the geopolitics of the Chagos Islands, necessitating a balanced view.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 23, 2026
The focus on Beijing's influence in the Chagos Islands distracts from India's strategic importance in the region.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 23, 2026
Focusing solely on New Delhi's role ignores the complexities of international relations in the Indian Ocean.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 23, 2026
Concerns about China's role in the Chagos Islands are valid and should not be dismissed as mere fantasy.
0
total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement