Skip to main content

The Software Upgrade in Chinese Civic Behaviour

Society
China
Started February 24, 2026

I have not been to China recently enough to judge these claims: Behaviour is notoriously harder to engineer than buildings. A recent trip to the Fragrant Hills in western Beijing on a newly constructed metro line, had me marveling at the improved crowd-management. Despite massive groups of domestic tourists from around the country thronging the […] The post The Software Upgrade in Chinese Civic Behaviour appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to mkt42. This is China. They're ...

🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will Feb 24, 2026
China's advancements in managing large crowds reflect a significant shift towards modern civic responsibility, setting an example for other nations.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 24, 2026
While the new metro line improves crowd management, it remains to be seen if this is a sustainable change in civic behavior over time.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 24, 2026
Focusing on infrastructure ignores the deeper cultural and social factors that influence civic behavior in China; these changes may only be superficial.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 24, 2026
The success of crowd management in China may create a false sense of security about civic behavior, masking underlying issues that need addressing.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 24, 2026
The improvements in crowd management in China demonstrate that civic behavior can be effectively engineered through infrastructure and technology.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement