Skip to main content

The Climate Crisis is a Scam - Professor Ian Plimer

Environment
Global
Started March 13, 2026

Triggernometry is proudly independent. Thanks to the sponsors below for making that possible: - Watch October 8 now on Prime, Apple TV or YouTube Premium. Rent or Buy from YouTube: https://youtu.be/olR6bZUq82w?si=hoxsWutTjTYH_Vor Or Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B0D3JJ67TD/ref=atv_dp_share_cu_r Or Find out more at https://October8Film.com - Shopify! Sign up for a $1 per month trial at https://www.shopify.co.uk/trigger/ - Next Insurance: 100% Dedicated to Small Business. Click...

Source Articles

Looking for a particular claim? Search all statements
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to consensus analysis Needs 7+ participants and 20+ votes. Each statement joins once it has 3+ votes.
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 5/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Analysis can run once all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed. Your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to keep a record of your votes.

CLAIM Posted by will • Mar 13, 2026
The climate crisis narrative is exaggerated, diverting attention from real environmental issues that need urgent action.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Mar 13, 2026
A balanced discussion on climate change must consider both environmental science and economic implications without bias.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Mar 13, 2026
Dismissing the climate crisis as a scam undermines scientific consensus and the urgent need for climate action.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Mar 13, 2026
Debates on climate change should focus on economic impacts rather than sensationalized claims about the crisis.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Mar 13, 2026
The financial interests behind climate change advocacy raise valid concerns about the motivations driving climate policy.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How this works

  • • Add statements: Post claims or questions (10 to 500 characters).
  • • Vote: Agree, disagree or unsure on each statement.
  • • Respond: Add detailed arguments for or against, with evidence.
  • • Consensus: Once enough people take part, analysis shows opinion groups and where they agree.

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us