Aller au contenu principal
Retour aux discussions

La crise climatique est une escroquerie - Professeur Ian Plimer

Environment
Global
Commencé March 13, 2026

Triggernometry is proudly independent. Thanks to the sponsors below for making that possible: - Watch October 8 now on Prime, Apple TV or YouTube Premium. Rent or Buy from YouTube: https://youtu.be/olR6bZUq82w?si=hoxsWutTjTYH_Vor Or Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B0D3JJ67TD/ref=atv_dp_share_cu_r Or Find out more at https://October8Film.com - Shopify! Sign up for a $1 per month trial at https://www.shopify.co.uk/trigger/ - Next Insurance: 100% Dedicated to Small Business. Click...

Articles sources

Ajouter une affirmation Analyse 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 affirmations à voter • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Publié par will • Mar 13, 2026
Le récit de la crise climatique est exagéré, détournant l'attention des véritables enjeux environnementaux qui nécessitent une action urgente.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

The climate crisis narrative is exaggerated, diverting attention from real environmental issues that need urgent action.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Mar 13, 2026
Une discussion équilibrée sur le changement climatique doit considérer à la fois la science environnementale et les implications économiques sans parti pris.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

A balanced discussion on climate change must consider both environmental science and economic implications without bias.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Mar 13, 2026
Rejeter la crise climatique comme une arnaque mine le consensus scientifique et le besoin urgent d'action climatique.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

Dismissing the climate crisis as a scam undermines scientific consensus and the urgent need for climate action.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Mar 13, 2026
Les débats sur le changement climatique devraient se concentrer sur les impacts économiques plutôt que sur des affirmations sensationnalistes concernant la crise.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

Debates on climate change should focus on economic impacts rather than sensationalized claims about the crisis.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Mar 13, 2026
Les intérêts financiers derrière la défense du changement climatique soulèvent des préoccupations valides concernant les motivations qui animent la politique climatique.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

The financial interests behind climate change advocacy raise valid concerns about the motivations driving climate policy.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us