メインコンテンツに移動

気候危機は詐欺である——イアン・プライマー教授

Environment
グローバル
March 13, 2026に開始

Triggernometry is proudly independent. Thanks to the sponsors below for making that possible: - Watch October 8 now on Prime, Apple TV or YouTube Premium. Rent or Buy from YouTube: https://youtu.be/olR6bZUq82w?si=hoxsWutTjTYH_Vor Or Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B0D3JJ67TD/ref=atv_dp_share_cu_r Or Find out more at https://October8Film.com - Shopify! Sign up for a $1 per month trial at https://www.shopify.co.uk/trigger/ - Next Insurance: 100% Dedicated to Small Business. Click...

ソース記事

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 投票すべき主張 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 投稿者: will Mar 13, 2026
気候危機の物語は誇張されており、緊急の対策が必要とされる現実の環境問題から注意をそらしている。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

The climate crisis narrative is exaggerated, diverting attention from real environmental issues that need urgent action.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: will Mar 13, 2026
気候変動に関するバランスの取れた議論は、偏見なく環境科学と経済的影響の両方を考慮する必要がある。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

A balanced discussion on climate change must consider both environmental science and economic implications without bias.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: will Mar 13, 2026
気候危機を詐欺として退ける行為は、科学的コンセンサスと気候変動対策の緊急性を損なうものである。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

Dismissing the climate crisis as a scam undermines scientific consensus and the urgent need for climate action.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: will Mar 13, 2026
気候変動に関する議論は、危機に関する扇動的な主張ではなく、経済的影響に焦点を当てるべきである。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

Debates on climate change should focus on economic impacts rather than sensationalized claims about the crisis.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: will Mar 13, 2026
気候変動提唱の背後にある金銭的利益は、気候政策を推進する動機についての正当な懸念を提起する。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

The financial interests behind climate change advocacy raise valid concerns about the motivations driving climate policy.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us