주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

기후 위기는 사기다 - 이안 플라이머 교수

Environment
글로벌
March 13, 2026에 시작됨

Triggernometry is proudly independent. Thanks to the sponsors below for making that possible: - Watch October 8 now on Prime, Apple TV or YouTube Premium. Rent or Buy from YouTube: https://youtu.be/olR6bZUq82w?si=hoxsWutTjTYH_Vor Or Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B0D3JJ67TD/ref=atv_dp_share_cu_r Or Find out more at https://October8Film.com - Shopify! Sign up for a $1 per month trial at https://www.shopify.co.uk/trigger/ - Next Insurance: 100% Dedicated to Small Business. Click...

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 투표할 진술 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 게시자: will Mar 13, 2026
기후 위기 담론은 과장되어 있으며, 긴급한 조치가 필요한 실제 환경 문제로부터 관심을 돌린다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

The climate crisis narrative is exaggerated, diverting attention from real environmental issues that need urgent action.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Mar 13, 2026
기후 변화에 대한 균형잡힌 논의는 편견 없이 환경 과학과 경제적 영향을 모두 고려해야 한다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

A balanced discussion on climate change must consider both environmental science and economic implications without bias.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Mar 13, 2026
기후 위기를 사기로 폄하하는 것은 과학적 합의와 시급한 기후 행동의 필요성을 훼손한다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

Dismissing the climate crisis as a scam undermines scientific consensus and the urgent need for climate action.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Mar 13, 2026
기후 변화에 대한 논쟁은 위기에 대한 선정적 주장보다는 경제적 영향에 초점을 맞춰야 한다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

Debates on climate change should focus on economic impacts rather than sensationalized claims about the crisis.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Mar 13, 2026
기후 변화 옹호 뒤에 숨은 재정적 이익은 기후 정책을 추진하는 동기에 대한 타당한 우려를 제기한다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

The financial interests behind climate change advocacy raise valid concerns about the motivations driving climate policy.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us