Skip to main content

More Students Use AI for Homework, and More Believe It Harms Critical Thinking

Education
United States
Started March 18, 2026

In 2025, most U.S. students who used artificial intelligence (AI) for homework worried about its effects on critical thinking. Survey results from 1,214 youth offer insights to help schools guide students in using AI to enhance, not replace, learning

🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will Mar 18, 2026
Schools must prioritize teaching critical thinking over the convenience of AI, ensuring that students develop essential cognitive skills.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Mar 18, 2026
Integrating AI tools in homework can enhance learning by providing personalized feedback and resources tailored to student needs.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Mar 18, 2026
Relying on AI for homework diminishes students' critical thinking skills, making them less capable of independent problem-solving.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Mar 18, 2026
AI can serve as a complementary tool in education, but its impact on critical thinking depends on how it's integrated into learning processes.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Mar 18, 2026
Students should be educated on responsible AI use to maximize its benefits while minimizing potential harm to their analytical abilities.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us