Skip to main content

Claims about AI and science

Technology
United States
Started January 17, 2026

You should take these as quite context-specific numbers rather than as absolutes, nonetheless this is interesting: Scientists who engage in AI-augmented research publish 3.02 times more papers, receive 4.84 times more citations and become research project leaders 1.37 years earlier than those who do not. By contrast, AI adoption shrinks the collective volume of scientific […] The post Claims about AI and science appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. Comments“AI adoption shrinks the collectiv...

Source Articles

🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will Jan 17, 2026
AI tools enable researchers to lead projects earlier, fostering a new generation of leaders in science and technology.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 17, 2026
While AI adoption boosts individual productivity, it also risks reducing the overall scientific discourse and collaboration.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 17, 2026
The reliance on AI could undermine the quality of scientific research, as quantity may overshadow rigor and critical analysis.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 17, 2026
AI-augmented research significantly enhances scientific output, leading to more publications and citations, thus driving innovation.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 17, 2026
The rise of AI in research may create an uneven playing field, disadvantaging scientists who cannot access these technologies.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement