Ga naar hoofdinhoud
Terug naar Discussies

'Onpatriotische conservatieven' opnieuw

Politics
United States
Gestart March 25, 2026

At the beginning of the Iraq War, David Frum published an article in National Review entitled “Unpatriotic Conservatives,” attacking those on the right opposed to the war—including the founders of this magazine, Patrick J. Buchanan, Scott McConnell, and Taki Theodoracopulos. Almost a quarter-century later, Frum’s arguments stand out as particularly lazy and dishonest smears. Almost […] The post ‘Unpatriotic Conservatives’ Redux appeared first on The American Conservative

Bronartikel

Stelling toevoegen Analyse 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 stellingen om op te stemmen • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Geplaatst door will • Mar 25, 2026
De term 'onpatriotische conservatieven' riskeert de rechterzijde verder te polariseren, waardoor eenheid en samenwerking aan belangrijke nationale vraagstukken worden belemmerd.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

The term 'unpatriotic conservatives' risks polarizing the right further, hindering unity and collaboration on key issues facing the nation.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door will • Mar 25, 2026
Kritiek van conservatieven op de Irak-oorlog onderstreept de noodzaak van diverse meningen binnen een partij, wat bevordert tot gezonder politiek debat.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

Criticism of the Iraq War from conservatives highlights the need for diverse opinions within a party, fostering a healthier political discourse.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door will • Mar 25, 2026
Het debat over 'onpatriotische conservatieven' weerspiegelt bredere spanningen binnen het Amerikaanse conservatisme over buitenlands beleid en nationale identiteit.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

The debate over 'unpatriotic conservatives' reflects broader tensions in American conservatism regarding foreign policy and national identity.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door will • Mar 25, 2026
Het originele artikel van David Frum herinnert ons eraan dat loyaliteit aan de partij vaak kritisch denken en dissent in conservatieve kringen overschaduwt.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

David Frum's original article serves as a reminder that loyalty to party often overshadows critical thinking and dissent in conservative circles.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door will • Mar 25, 2026
Het bestempelen van dissidente conservatieven als 'onpatriotisch' ondermijnt de principes van vrijheid van meningsuiting en robust debat binnen het politieke landschap.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

Labeling dissenting conservatives as 'unpatriotic' undermines the principles of free speech and robust debate within the political landscape.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us