Skip to main content

Legal and Policy Approaches to Mitigate Catastrophic Harms from AI

Technology
United States
Started March 27, 2026

A Delphi study with 24 experts found few viable policies to curb catastrophic artificial intelligence risks. Experts favored risk disclosure incentives and voluntary safety standards, with near-term progress likely from state and industry action

🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will Mar 27, 2026
Focusing solely on incentives and voluntary standards may create a false sense of security while ignoring the urgent need for comprehensive oversight.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Mar 27, 2026
Implementing risk disclosure incentives will empower stakeholders to make informed decisions, ultimately reducing catastrophic AI risks.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Mar 27, 2026
The potential for catastrophic harms from AI justifies immediate and robust policy interventions rather than waiting for voluntary compliance.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Mar 27, 2026
Voluntary safety standards may not be sufficient to prevent catastrophic harms from AI; mandatory regulations are essential for effective risk management.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Mar 27, 2026
State and industry collaboration could advance AI safety, but we must balance innovation with necessary safeguards to protect society.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us