Meld je aan om op te slaan en updates te ontvangen.
Hier is waarom sommige mensen cryonica kiezen om hun lichaam en hersenen na de dood op te slaan
This week I reported on some rather unusual research that focuses on the brain of L. Stephen Coles. Coles was a gerontologist who died from pancreatic cancer in 2014. He had spent the latter part of his career specializing in human longevity. And before he died, he decided to have his brain preserved by a…
Bronartikel
MIT Technology Review (United States) | Mar 27, 2026
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen
Investing in cryonics is an unrealistic gamble, as the science behind revival remains speculative and unproven.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen
The ethics of cryonics should be examined, particularly regarding consent and the implications of potentially reviving individuals in the future.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen
Cryonics provides a valuable research opportunity to explore the limits of human longevity, benefiting future generations.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen
The high costs and emotional burden of cryonics may exploit the fears of death, leading to financial and psychological harm.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen
Cryonics offers a hopeful solution for extending human life and advancing our understanding of aging and consciousness.
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement
Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.
Support us