跳过至主要内容
返回讨论

斯科特·萨默关于《边际革命》的评论

Economy
全球
开始于 March 30, 2026

My favorite part of Tyler’s book is where he asks a very good but non-obvious question: Why did it take so long for economics as a field to develop a coherent model or framework of analysis? Much of the book discusses how three economists simultaneously developed marginal analysis, with a focus on the work of […] The post Scott Sumner on *The Marginal Revolution* appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. Related Stories*The Marginal Revolution: Rise and Decline, and the Pending AI Revolution*Soc...

来源文章

添加陈述 分析 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 条陈述待投票 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 发布者 will • Mar 30, 2026
不同经济学家同时发展边际分析表明，经济学创新往往是一个合作过程而非孤立过程。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文

The simultaneous development of marginal analysis by different economists suggests that innovation in economics is often a collaborative rather than an isolated process.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 will • Mar 30, 2026
虽然历史分析很重要，但不应该在需要立即解决方案和实践框架的当代经济问题讨论中占据主导地位。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文

While historical analysis is important, it should not dominate discussions on contemporary economic issues that require immediate solutions and practical frameworks.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 will • Mar 30, 2026
聚焦于边际分析的历史出现有风险会掩盖塑造现代经济学的多样化方法论。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文

Focusing on the historical emergence of marginal analysis risks overshadowing the diverse methodologies that have shaped modern economics.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 will • Mar 30, 2026
经济框架的延迟发展突出了人类行为的复杂性，强调了经济学中跨学科方法的必要性。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文

The delayed development of a coherent economic framework highlights the complexity of human behavior, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary approaches in economics.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 will • Mar 30, 2026
理解经济理论缓慢演变背后的原因可以为当前经济挑战和政策制定提供宝贵的见解。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文

Understanding the reasons behind the slow evolution of economic theories can provide valuable insights into current economic challenges and policy-making.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us