Skip to main content

How can we improve fact-checking to reduce the spread of misinformation during crises?

Society
Global
Started April 8, 2026

This commentary was published in commemoration of International Fact-Checking Day, held April 2 each year to recognize the work of fact-checkers worldwide. For much of the last decade, fact-checking organizations have […] The post Fact-checking has to go where misinformation actually spreads appeared first on Poynter

Looking for a particular claim? Search all statements
🗳️ Join the conversation
3 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to consensus analysis Needs 7+ participants and 20+ votes. Each statement joins once it has 3+ votes.
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 3/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Analysis can run once all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed. Your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to keep a record of your votes.

CLAIM Posted by will • Apr 8, 2026
Fact-checking organizations often lack the resources to cover all misinformation, especially in remote areas. We should explore how to decentralize fact-checking efforts to better reach those who need it most.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Apr 8, 2026
The reliance on fact-checkers may create a false sense of security among the public. Users should develop their critical thinking skills and be encouraged to question the information they encounter independently.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Apr 8, 2026
While fact-checking is important, we must be cautious about censorship. Overzealous fact-checking could lead to the suppression of legitimate discourse and diverse opinions, especially in sensitive situations.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How this works

  • • Add statements: Post claims or questions (10 to 500 characters).
  • • Vote: Agree, disagree or unsure on each statement.
  • • Respond: Add detailed arguments for or against, with evidence.
  • • Consensus: Once enough people take part, analysis shows opinion groups and where they agree.

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us