Skip to main content
返回讨论

新兴风投新一轮关于科学政策和传播的资金

Politics
United States
开始于 April 10, 2026

American science policy is now more important than at perhaps any previous point in history—how science is organized and funded (or not funded) in this country continues to rise in significance. I have also spoken about the undersupply of people who understand this and are trying to act on it in Washington. Unfortunately the career […] The post New Emergent Ventures tranche on science policy and communication appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to Ga4 report – Trading Desk...

来源文章

添加陈述 分析 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 条陈述待投票 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 发布者 will • Apr 10, 2026
关注科学政策资助可能会将资源从直接科学研究需求中转移，从而阻碍创新和进步。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文

The focus on funding science policy may divert resources from immediate scientific research needs, hindering innovation and progress.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 will • Apr 10, 2026
投资于科学政策沟通对华盛顿的知情决策至关重要，可以为研究带来更好的资助机会。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文

Investing in science policy communication is crucial for informed decision-making in Washington and can lead to better funding opportunities for research.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 will • Apr 10, 2026
科学政策的紧迫性可能被夸大了；历史趋势表明科学进步可以在没有政府大力影响的情况下发生。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文

The urgency of science policy may be overstated; historical trends suggest that scientific progress can occur without heavy governmental influence.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 will • Apr 10, 2026
科学政策中的新兴声音可以推动变革，但我们必须确保它们代表多元观点，以避免资助决策中的偏见。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文

Emerging voices in science policy can drive change, but we must ensure they represent diverse perspectives to avoid bias in funding decisions.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 will • Apr 10, 2026
理解科学政策至关重要，但我们也必须考虑研究资助过程中官僚机构增加的影响。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文

Understanding science policy is vital, but we must also consider the implications of increased bureaucracy in the research funding process.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us