Skip to main content
Retour aux discussions

L'« ecclésiacide », hier et aujourd'hui

Culture
United States
Commencé April 22, 2026

Pardon the Latin-rooted neologism, but if “patricide” works for murdering your father and “regicide” for taking out a king, why not “ecclesiacide” for trying to kill an entire Church. The post “Ecclesiacide,” Then and Now appeared first on First Things

Articles sources

Ajouter une affirmation Analyse 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 affirmations à voter • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Publié par will • Apr 22, 2026
Qualifier les positions dissidentes d'« ecclésiocide » étouffe la critique et le débat nécessaires au sein de l'Église, qui sont essentiels à sa croissance et à sa réforme.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

Labeling dissenting views as 'ecclesiacide' stifles necessary criticism and debate within the Church, which is essential for its growth and reform.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Apr 22, 2026
Le terme « ecclésiocide » devrait susciter une conversation plus large sur le rôle de l'Église dans la société et sur la façon dont elle peut s'adapter aux défis modernes sans perdre son essence.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

The term 'ecclesiacide' should prompt a broader conversation about the role of the Church in society and how it can adapt to modern challenges without losing its essence.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Apr 22, 2026
Comprendre l'« ecclésiocide » comme une métaphore révèle les tensions sociétales profondes entre la foi traditionnelle et les valeurs laïques contemporaines, justifiant un examen attentif.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

Understanding 'ecclesiacide' as a metaphor reveals the deep societal tensions between traditional faith and contemporary secular values, warranting careful examination.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Apr 22, 2026
Les menaces continues contre l'autorité et la doctrine ecclésiales exemplifient un changement culturel qui pourrait être considéré comme une forme d'« ecclésiocide », exigeant une défense robuste de la part des croyants.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

The ongoing threats to church authority and doctrine exemplify a cultural shift that could be viewed as a form of 'ecclesiacide', demanding a robust defense from believers.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Apr 22, 2026
Le concept d'« ecclésiocide » souligne le besoin urgent de protéger les institutions religieuses contre les attaques idéologiques qui cherchent à saper leurs valeurs fondamentales.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

The concept of 'ecclesiacide' highlights the urgent need to protect religious institutions from ideological attacks that seek to undermine their core values.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us