Inicia sesión para guardar y recibir actualizaciones.
Desempleo tecnológico en la Inglaterra Victoriana
We do not know whether technological unemployment swept across England in the wake of the British Industrial Revolution. In this paper, I propose an approach to quantify jobs lost to, and created by, creative destruction in the 19th century. Using over 170 million individual records from the full-count British census (1851–1911), I generate sub-industry “task” […] The post Technological unemployment in Victorian Britain appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to Steve Sailer. ...
Artículos de Fuentes
Marginal Revolution (United States) | Apr 22, 2026
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
Traducido por IA · Ver original
Focusing solely on job loss from technological change ignores the creative destruction that ultimately leads to economic growth.
Traducido por IA · Ver original
The relationship between technology and employment in the 19th century is complex and warrants a nuanced analysis to inform modern policies.
Traducido por IA · Ver original
Understanding job dynamics in Victorian Britain can provide valuable insights into current debates on automation and job displacement.
Traducido por IA · Ver original
The study of technological unemployment in Victorian Britain reveals critical lessons about the impact of innovation on labor markets today.
Traducido por IA · Ver original
Quantifying job loss in the 19th century overlooks the broader societal benefits of technological advancement during the Industrial Revolution.
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement
Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.
Support us