Skip to main content

Pourquoi Palantir et OpenAI ont-ils peur d'Alex Bores ?

Politics
United States
Commencé April 22, 2026

Leading the Future, a super PAC whose funders include the founders of companies like Palantir and OpenAI, is spending millions of dollars this election cycle, and a considerable amount of that money is going toward attack ads against Alex Bores – even though Bores himself used to work for Palantir. Bores is a New York state assemblyman who is running for Congress to represent New York’s 12th District. His campaign includes an extensive A.I. policy platform, including demands for A.I. companie...

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 affirmations à voter • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Publié par will Apr 22, 2026
La plateforme de politique d'I.A. d'Alex Bores est cruciale pour réglementer les puissantes entreprises technologiques et assurer le développement éthique de l'I.A.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

Alex Bores’ A.I. policy platform is crucial for regulating powerful tech companies and ensuring ethical A.I. development.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will Apr 22, 2026
L'implication de super PAC dans les campagnes politiques, comme Leading the Future, complique la relation entre l'argent et la démocratie.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

The involvement of super PACs in political campaigns, like Leading the Future, complicates the relationship between money and democracy.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will Apr 22, 2026
Les publicités d'attaque contre Bores reflètent la crainte des grandes entreprises d'I.A. établies de perdre de l'influence, ce qui mine les processus démocratiques.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

The attack ads against Bores reflect the fear of established A.I. companies losing influence, undermining democratic processes.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will Apr 22, 2026
La campagne de Bores met en évidence l'importance de la transparence dans la politique de l'I.A., mais elle peut aussi servir les intérêts des entreprises au détriment du bien public.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

Bores’ campaign highlights the importance of transparency in A.I. policy, but it may also serve corporate interests over public good.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will Apr 22, 2026
Les travaux antérieurs de Bores chez Palantir soulèvent des questions sur sa crédibilité et son engagement à réglementer l'industrie technologique.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

Bores' previous work with Palantir raises questions about his credibility and commitment to regulating the tech industry.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us