주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기
번역 진행 중 — 귀하의 언어 버전을 준비하는 동안 이 콘텐츠가 영어로 표시됩니다.

How has Brexit changed the way we make laws and regulations in the UK, and what does that mean for citizens?

정치
United Kingdom
2026년 6월 18일에 시작됨

Brexit at 10: Regulation melissa.ittoo Wed, 17/06/2026 - 14:54 Much of the argument for Brexit was regulatory. 5 Comment Matthew Gill Institute for Government Yes Brexit Regulation Trade Artificial intelligence Utilities Business Cameron government May government Johnson government Sunak government No The Trade and Cooperation Agreement was designed to maximise regulatory autonomy – for Great Britain at least – by taking the UK firmly outside the orbit of the EU’s single market. And there has since been welcome innovation in UK regulation, which is being driven by individual regulators, regulatory networks, the Regulatory Innovation Office and government departments. 2 Gill M, Regulation and growth: Will the government’s strategy deliver?, Institute for Government, 2025, www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/regulatory-action-plan But much of this aims to resolve inefficiencies in the UK’s national regulatory arrangements, rather than to diverge from the EU (or lead the world). Regulation has been front and centre of implementing Brexit, but not in the way its proponents might have hoped. Related content Regulation and growth Only modest divergence from EU regulation has been achieved Five years ago, the IfG said it would be hard for the UK to realise the promised regulatory benefits of Brexit, 8 Rutter J and Marshal J, Taking back control of regulation: Managing divergence from EU rules, Institute for Government, 2021, www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/report/taking-back-control-regulation and so it has proved. Early enthusiasm for ‘sunsetting’ laws that were initially transferred onto the statute book to smooth the transition from the EU – as discussed by Jonathan Jones in this series – was quickly frustrated by business concerns about regulatory uncertainty and, in the case of GB businesses exporting to the EU, the cost and complexity of satisfying two regimes. The UK’s attempts to go it alone have sometimes proved unworkable and had to be qui

특정 주장을 찾고 계신가요? 모든 진술 검색
🗳️ 대화에 참여하세요
7 투표할 진술 • 당신의 관점이 분석을 만듭니다
📊 합의 분석 진행 상황 참여자 7명 이상, 20표 이상이 필요합니다. 각 진술은 3표 이상을 받으면 포함됩니다.
참여자 0/7
진술 (10 이상 권장) 7/10
총 투표 0/20
💡 진행 상황이 여기에 실시간으로 표시됩니다. 세 가지 조건이 모두 충족되면 분석을 실행할 수 있습니다.

당신의 투표가 반영됩니다

계정이 필요 없습니다. 투표는 저장되며 합의 분석에 포함됩니다. 계정을 만들면 투표 기록을 보관할 수 있습니다.

주장 게시자: will • 2026. 6. 18.
While Brexit has changed the legal landscape in the UK, the long-term impacts on citizen engagement and participation in the legislative process remain to be seen. It raises critical questions about how citizens can influence new regulatory frameworks moving forward.

번역 대기 중

이 진술에 대한 투표 옵션: 동의, 반대 또는 잘 모르겠음
투표하면 결과를 볼 수 있습니다
주장 게시자: will • 2026. 6. 18.
The shift in law-making power from Brussels to Westminster after Brexit has sparked a debate about the legitimacy and accountability of new regulations. Citizens need to understand how these changes affect their rights and daily lives to engage effectively.

번역 대기 중

이 진술에 대한 투표 옵션: 동의, 반대 또는 잘 모르겠음
투표하면 결과를 볼 수 있습니다
주장 게시자: will • 2026. 6. 18.
Since Brexit, there has been a noticeable fragmentation in regulatory standards between the UK and the EU, leading to potential complications for businesses operating internationally. This divergence may hinder trade and increase costs for consumers, ultimately affecting everyday life.

번역 대기 중

이 진술에 대한 투표 옵션: 동의, 반대 또는 잘 모르겠음
투표하면 결과를 볼 수 있습니다
주장 게시자: will • 2026. 6. 18.
Brexit has empowered the UK to create laws tailored to the specific needs of British citizens, free from EU regulations that may not reflect local priorities. This regulatory autonomy allows for innovation, especially in emerging sectors like technology and environmental policy.

번역 대기 중

이 진술에 대한 투표 옵션: 동의, 반대 또는 잘 모르겠음
투표하면 결과를 볼 수 있습니다
주장 게시자: will • 2026. 6. 18.
The UK's ability to negotiate its own trade deals post-Brexit can enhance economic opportunities and allow for bespoke agreements that benefit local industries, but it remains essential to ensure that these regulations do not compromise public welfare standards.

번역 대기 중

이 진술에 대한 투표 옵션: 동의, 반대 또는 잘 모르겠음
투표하면 결과를 볼 수 있습니다
주장 게시자: will • 2026. 6. 18.
The Trade and Cooperation Agreement has opened up opportunities for the UK to establish unique regulations that are better suited to its economy, such as in areas like agricultural standards. This could provide a competitive edge in global markets.

번역 대기 중

이 진술에 대한 투표 옵션: 동의, 반대 또는 잘 모르겠음
투표하면 결과를 볼 수 있습니다
주장 게시자: will • 2026. 6. 18.
Brexit has led to concerns about the erosion of workers' rights and environmental protections, as the government may prioritize deregulation to attract business. This could have dire consequences for both workers and the environment in the long run.

번역 대기 중

이 진술에 대한 투표 옵션: 동의, 반대 또는 잘 모르겠음
투표하면 결과를 볼 수 있습니다

💡 이용 방법

  • • 진술 추가: 주장이나 질문을 올리세요(10~500자).
  • • 투표: 각 진술에 동의, 반대 또는 잘 모르겠음으로 투표하세요.
  • • 응답: 근거와 함께 찬성 또는 반대 논거를 자세히 추가하세요.
  • • 합의: 충분한 사람이 참여하면 분석을 통해 의견 그룹과 그들이 동의하는 지점이 표시됩니다.

Society Speaks는 열려 있고 독립적입니다. 여러분의 후원은 시민 토론을 광고와 상업적 영향에서 자유롭게 지켜 줍니다.

후원하기