跳过至主要内容
翻译进行中 — 您的语言版本正在准备中,目前内容以英语显示。

How has Brexit changed the way we make laws and regulations in the UK, and what does that mean for citizens?

政治
United Kingdom
开始于 2026年6月18日

Brexit at 10: Regulation melissa.ittoo Wed, 17/06/2026 - 14:54 Much of the argument for Brexit was regulatory. 5 Comment Matthew Gill Institute for Government Yes Brexit Regulation Trade Artificial intelligence Utilities Business Cameron government May government Johnson government Sunak government No The Trade and Cooperation Agreement was designed to maximise regulatory autonomy – for Great Britain at least – by taking the UK firmly outside the orbit of the EU’s single market. And there has since been welcome innovation in UK regulation, which is being driven by individual regulators, regulatory networks, the Regulatory Innovation Office and government departments. 2 Gill M, Regulation and growth: Will the government’s strategy deliver?, Institute for Government, 2025, www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/regulatory-action-plan But much of this aims to resolve inefficiencies in the UK’s national regulatory arrangements, rather than to diverge from the EU (or lead the world). Regulation has been front and centre of implementing Brexit, but not in the way its proponents might have hoped. Related content Regulation and growth Only modest divergence from EU regulation has been achieved Five years ago, the IfG said it would be hard for the UK to realise the promised regulatory benefits of Brexit, 8 Rutter J and Marshal J, Taking back control of regulation: Managing divergence from EU rules, Institute for Government, 2021, www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/report/taking-back-control-regulation and so it has proved. Early enthusiasm for ‘sunsetting’ laws that were initially transferred onto the statute book to smooth the transition from the EU – as discussed by Jonathan Jones in this series – was quickly frustrated by business concerns about regulatory uncertainty and, in the case of GB businesses exporting to the EU, the cost and complexity of satisfying two regimes. The UK’s attempts to go it alone have sometimes proved unworkable and had to be qui

来源文章

在找某个具体观点吗? 搜索所有陈述
🗳️ 加入对话
7 条陈述待投票 • 您的观点影响分析结果
📊 共识分析进度 需要 7+ 名参与者和 20+ 票。每条陈述获得 3+ 票后即纳入分析。
参与者 0/7
陈述 (建议 10+) 7/10
总投票数 0/20
💡 进度会在此实时更新。三项要求全部满足后即可运行分析。

您的投票很重要

无需账号。您的投票会被保存并计入共识分析。 创建账号即可保存您的投票记录。

观点 发布者 will • 2026年6月18日
While Brexit has changed the legal landscape in the UK, the long-term impacts on citizen engagement and participation in the legislative process remain to be seen. It raises critical questions about how citizens can influence new regulatory frameworks moving forward.

翻译待处理

此陈述的投票选项:同意、不同意或不确定
投票后查看结果
观点 发布者 will • 2026年6月18日
The shift in law-making power from Brussels to Westminster after Brexit has sparked a debate about the legitimacy and accountability of new regulations. Citizens need to understand how these changes affect their rights and daily lives to engage effectively.

翻译待处理

此陈述的投票选项:同意、不同意或不确定
投票后查看结果
观点 发布者 will • 2026年6月18日
Since Brexit, there has been a noticeable fragmentation in regulatory standards between the UK and the EU, leading to potential complications for businesses operating internationally. This divergence may hinder trade and increase costs for consumers, ultimately affecting everyday life.

翻译待处理

此陈述的投票选项:同意、不同意或不确定
投票后查看结果
观点 发布者 will • 2026年6月18日
Brexit has empowered the UK to create laws tailored to the specific needs of British citizens, free from EU regulations that may not reflect local priorities. This regulatory autonomy allows for innovation, especially in emerging sectors like technology and environmental policy.

翻译待处理

此陈述的投票选项:同意、不同意或不确定
投票后查看结果
观点 发布者 will • 2026年6月18日
The UK's ability to negotiate its own trade deals post-Brexit can enhance economic opportunities and allow for bespoke agreements that benefit local industries, but it remains essential to ensure that these regulations do not compromise public welfare standards.

翻译待处理

此陈述的投票选项:同意、不同意或不确定
投票后查看结果
观点 发布者 will • 2026年6月18日
The Trade and Cooperation Agreement has opened up opportunities for the UK to establish unique regulations that are better suited to its economy, such as in areas like agricultural standards. This could provide a competitive edge in global markets.

翻译待处理

此陈述的投票选项:同意、不同意或不确定
投票后查看结果
观点 发布者 will • 2026年6月18日
Brexit has led to concerns about the erosion of workers' rights and environmental protections, as the government may prioritize deregulation to attract business. This could have dire consequences for both workers and the environment in the long run.

翻译待处理

此陈述的投票选项:同意、不同意或不确定
投票后查看结果

💡 使用说明

  • • 添加陈述: 发布观点或问题(10 至 500 个字符)。
  • • 投票: 对每条陈述选择同意、不同意或不确定。
  • • 回应: 附上证据,详细阐述支持或反对的理由。
  • • 共识: 参与人数足够后,分析会显示各意见群体及其共识所在。

Society Speaks 开放且独立。 您的支持让公民讨论远离广告和商业影响。

支持我们