Skip to main content

What Davos (and Mark Carney) get wrong

Economy
Global
Started January 23, 2026

That is the topic of my latest Free Press column, here is one excerpt: Though Donald Trump seems to be calling off his latest trade war, the United States has indeed retreated from free trade with a new era of tariffs. It’s a development I rue. But Canada just opened its market to Chinese cars. […] The post What Davos (and Mark Carney) get wrong appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to Philip Lingard. “abandonment of what we . by TMCThis line of criticism is like complaining...

Source Articles

Looking for a particular claim? Search all statements
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to consensus analysis Needs 7+ participants and 20+ votes. Each statement joins once it has 3+ votes.
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 5/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Analysis can run once all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed. Your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to keep a record of your votes.

CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 23, 2026
The retreat from free trade is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of its long-term economic impacts.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 23, 2026
Davos discussions often overlook the realities of national interests, which can justify protective trade measures.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 23, 2026
The U.S. tariffs reflect a necessary shift towards protecting domestic industries amid global trade tensions.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 23, 2026
Mark Carney's views on global trade fail to address the immediate economic needs of workers affected by globalization.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 23, 2026
Canada's openness to Chinese cars undermines the principle of fair competition and may harm local manufacturers.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How this works

  • • Add statements: Post claims or questions (10 to 500 characters).
  • • Vote: Agree, disagree or unsure on each statement.
  • • Respond: Add detailed arguments for or against, with evidence.
  • • Consensus: Once enough people take part, analysis shows opinion groups and where they agree.

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us