What are the potential implications of the U.S. changing its role in the global order for international relations and domestic policy?

Geopolitics
Global
Started January 06, 2026

Ian Bremmer — president and founder of Eurasia Group, a top global political-risk research and consulting firm — says the top geopolitical risk for 2026 is the "U.S. Political Revolution," with President Trump "so committed to and so capable of changing the political system." Why it matters: Eurasia Group's annual "Top Risks" report — out Monday, 48 hours after Trump shook the world by snatching Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro — isolates the "biggest threats to the trajectories of nations, industries and institutions," to help leaders and investors prepare for the year. "The United States is itself unwinding its own global order," says Bremmer, also president and founder of GZERO Media. "The world's most powerful country is in the throes of a political revolution. In our lifetimes, we have never witnessed an American president so committed to and so capable of changing the political system and, accordingly, the United States' role in the world." Other risks: The report says Europe's center is faltering . water is being weaponized as a resource for countries and businesses . and U.S. attacks on clean energy endanger the nation's AI lead, giving China a potential advantage in post-carbon energy production. That's all happening amid the AI boom, which "represents the greatest opportunity and danger humanity has ever created, and with next to no governance, alignment, or coordination," write Bremmer and Cliff Kupchan, Eurasia Group's chair. The rest of the Top 10: 2. Overpowered (electric stack) . 3. Donroe Doctrine . 4. Europe under siege . 5. Russia's second front (hybrid war between Russia and NATO) . 6. State capitalism with American characteristics ("the most economically interventionist administration since the New Deal"). 7. China's deflation trap . 8. AI eats its users . 9. Zombie USMCA (U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement) . and 10. The water weapon (a tool for non-state actors exploiting state weakness. What was a humanitarian crisis is becoming a national security threat

Source Articles

Ian Bremmer: U.S. ending "own global order"

Axios (United States) | Jan 05, 2026

7
Statements
0
Agree Votes
0
Disagree Votes
0
Unsure Votes
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 7/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

You're voting anonymously

Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.

CLAIM Posted by will Jan 06, 2026
The implications of the U.S. changing its global role are complex. While some argue it could lead to greater international collaboration, others warn it could exacerbate tensions. It is crucial to consider the potential consequences for both foreign policy and domestic priorities.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 06, 2026
Shifting the U.S. focus inward may allow for much-needed investment in domestic issues such as healthcare and education, suggesting that prioritizing domestic policy could have long-term benefits for American citizens.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 06, 2026
If the U.S. retreats from its leadership role, it may create a power vacuum that could be filled by authoritarian regimes, undermining democratic values and international norms. This shift could destabilize regions and embolden adversaries, leading to increased global conflict.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 06, 2026
A reduced U.S. presence could enhance national sovereignty for many countries, allowing them to pursue policies that better align with their own interests rather than conforming to a U.S.-centric framework. This could lead to a more diverse array of solutions to global issues.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 06, 2026
Domestic policy may suffer if the U.S. lessens its commitment to global leadership. Important international partnerships could be weakened, impacting trade, security, and climate initiatives that directly affect U.S. citizens and the economy.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 06, 2026
Reevaluating the U.S. role in the global order invites debate about the balance between national interests and global responsibilities. How can the U.S. redefine its engagement without alienating allies or undermining efforts to address global challenges?
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 06, 2026
A shift in the U.S. role in the global order can lead to increased multipolarity, allowing other countries to take on more responsibility in international governance. This could foster cooperation and shared leadership, encouraging a more equitable global system.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement