Aller au contenu principal
Traduction en cours — ce contenu s’affiche en anglais pendant que votre version dans votre langue est en préparation.

Emergent Ventures winners, 56th cohort

Technology
Global
Commencé July 20, 2026

Audrey London, Los Angeles, to write a book on water in California. Seyi Oluwasanmi, London, to bring Brits to SF to learn tech. Thomas Haferlach, Berlin, payments and compute layer for the long tail of AI apps. Juan Ramón Egea Fernández, Andalusia, tech. Teo Spiro, Israel, AI and biology. Amitav Krishna, suburban Ontario, 14, quantum. […] The post Emergent Ventures winners, 56th cohort appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. Related StoriesMy excellent Conversation with Chase Koch*Who Thinks ...

Articles sources

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 affirmations à voter • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Publié par admin Jul 20, 2026
Seyi Oluwasanmi's initiative to bring Brits to San Francisco for tech education will enhance cross-cultural collaboration in innovation.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Jul 20, 2026
Audrey London’s book on water in California will provide critical insights into the state's ongoing water crisis.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Jul 20, 2026
Early-stage venture funding should prioritise founders working on infrastructure problems like payments and compute layers over those building consumer applications.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Jul 20, 2026
Biotech and AI convergence research like Teo Spiro's work represents the highest-leverage application of early-stage capital because it compounds across multiple industries.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Jul 20, 2026
Venture capital focused on fundamental infrastructure for AI applications will generate more total value creation than direct funding of AI consumer products in the next five years.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Jul 20, 2026
Emergent Ventures should prioritize projects that demonstrate immediate social impact rather than those focused purely on technological advancement.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Jul 20, 2026
Amitav Krishna's work on quantum technology at the age of 14 is impressive but lacks real-world applicability at this stage.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Jul 20, 2026
Investing in a diverse range of projects like those in the 56th cohort is vital for fostering innovation across multiple sectors.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Jul 20, 2026
Investing in Juan Ramón Egea Fernández's tech venture in Andalusia is a gamble with uncertain returns.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Jul 20, 2026
Whether founders are 14 or 40, venture capital should be allocated based on the tractability and impact of the problem being solved, not the founder's age or background.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us