मुख्य सामग्री पर जाएं
अनुवाद जारी है — आपकी भाषा का संस्करण तैयार होने तक यह सामग्री अंग्रेज़ी में दिखाई जा रही है।

Alec Stapp on the new Science report from Michael Kratsios

Technology
United States
July 22, 2026 को शुरू किया गया

Major new report from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Five things in the report I really liked: 1. Proposes metascience units as a way to advance experimentation in science agencies. IFP recommended OSTP take this forward in our response to a 2025 RFI. 2. Advocates for a portfolio approach to federal […] The post Alec Stapp on the new Science report from Michael Kratsios appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. Related StoriesIs America ruled by an oligarchy?Words of wi...

स्रोत लेख

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 मतदान के लिए कथन • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM द्वारा पोस्ट admin Jul 22, 2026
Stakeholder engagement in science policy should focus on achieving clear, actionable outcomes rather than consensus alone.

अनुवाद लंबित है

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM द्वारा पोस्ट admin Jul 22, 2026
A balance between experimentation and theoretical work is essential for the progress of science.

अनुवाद लंबित है

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM द्वारा पोस्ट admin Jul 22, 2026
The concept of metascience units risks bureaucratizing scientific inquiry and stifling innovation.

अनुवाद लंबित है

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM द्वारा पोस्ट admin Jul 22, 2026
Overemphasis on experimentation may lead to neglecting critical theoretical research in science.

अनुवाद लंबित है

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM द्वारा पोस्ट admin Jul 22, 2026
Including more stakeholders in science policy-making may complicate decision-making and slow down progress.

अनुवाद लंबित है

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM द्वारा पोस्ट admin Jul 22, 2026
The effectiveness of a portfolio approach in science funding should be evaluated against specific performance metrics.

अनुवाद लंबित है

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM द्वारा पोस्ट admin Jul 22, 2026
The proposed metascience units in the new report will significantly enhance experimentation in federal science agencies.

अनुवाद लंबित है

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM द्वारा पोस्ट admin Jul 22, 2026
A portfolio approach to federal science funding will lead to more effective and diverse research outcomes.

अनुवाद लंबित है

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM द्वारा पोस्ट admin Jul 22, 2026
The new report will likely face criticism if it does not address existing inequities in science funding and access.

अनुवाद लंबित है

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM द्वारा पोस्ट admin Jul 22, 2026
The White House should prioritize transparency and public engagement in the implementation of metascience units.

अनुवाद लंबित है

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us