انتقل إلى المحتوى الرئيسي
الترجمة جارية — يُعرض هذا المحتوى باللغة الإنجليزية أثناء إعداد نسختك بلغتك.

A natural experiment in economics

Society
عالمي
بدأ في July 25, 2026

To study whether and how academics respond to political pressure, we exploit a natural experiment: the publication in early 2025 of a “blacklist” of words flagged by the U.S. government. We find that the release of this list led to a sharp reduction in the use of these flagged words among economists at universities that […] The post A natural experiment in economics appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. Related StoriesDemocrats are more politically segregated than are RepublicansWhat should ...

مقالات المصادر

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 تصريحات للتصويت • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Jul 25, 2026
Public deliberation about how institutions respond to government signals requires transparency from universities about their internal policies.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Jul 25, 2026
Universities that showed larger word-use reductions than others likely experienced stronger internal pressure on faculty speech.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Jul 25, 2026
Natural experiments like word-use changes reveal how institutions and individuals respond to external pressure in measurable ways.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Jul 25, 2026
Government communication about language use is a legitimate policy tool that economists, like all citizens, are free to follow or reject.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Jul 25, 2026
Economists may avoid flagged words for reasons unrelated to pressure, such as evolving scholarly consensus on terminology.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Jul 25, 2026
Government lists identifying problematic language help focus academic discourse on clarity and prevent misuse of terms.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Jul 25, 2026
The reduction in flagged word usage among economists proves that government pressure successfully shapes academic speech.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Jul 25, 2026
If researchers document causal effects of government lists on academic speech, policymakers should reconsider whether such lists serve their stated purpose.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Jul 25, 2026
Word-use changes cannot distinguish between voluntary adoption of preferred language and coercive avoidance.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM نشر بواسطة admin Jul 25, 2026
Studies showing differential responses across universities indicate that institutional leadership and culture shape how pressure translates into practice.

الترجمة قيد الإعداد

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us