Trending topics from trusted journalism, transformed into structured debates. Unlike our community discussions, these are automatically curated from breaking news to spark timely, nuanced conversation.
How is this different from Explore?
News Discussions are automatically generated from trending stories in real-time. Explore Discussions shows community-created topics on any subject. Both use the same structured debate format, but News focuses on current affairs.
Our News Sources(156 trusted outlets)
We aggregate stories from these reputable sources to ensure balanced, quality coverage:
Acquired Podcast
Africa Confidential
Al Jazeera English
Al Monitor
All-In Podcast
AllAfrica
Americas Quarterly
Andrew Sullivan
Anne Applebaum
Ars Technica
Associated Press
Axios
BBC News
BBC Sport
BBC World Service
Bloomberg
Brookings Institution
CSIS
Caixin Global
Carbon Brief
Carnegie Endowment
Cato Institute
Channel NewsAsia
Chartbook
Chatham House
Christianity Today
City Journal
Clean Energy Wire
CoinDesk
Columbia Journalism Review
Commentary Magazine
Commonweal
Cory Doctorow
Daily Maverick
Daily Wire
Decrypt
Deutsche Welle
Diary of a CEO
E&E News
ESPN
El País América
El País English
Euractiv
Eurostat
Ezra Klein
Farnam Street
Financial Times
First Things
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
France24
Francis Fukuyama
Freddie deBoer
Haaretz
Hot Air
Huberman Lab
IEA
IMF
Ian Bremmer
Institute for Fiscal Studies
Institute for Government
International Crisis Group
Jonathan Rauch
Law & Liberty
Le Monde English
Lex Fridman Podcast
MIT Technology Review
Mail & Guardian
Manhattan Institute
Marginal Revolution
Matt Taibbi
Modern Wisdom
National Review
Nature News
New Statesman
Nieman Lab
Nikkei Asia
Noahpinion
Not Boring
OECD
Office for Budget Responsibility
Office for National Statistics
Our World in Data
Paul Graham
Pew Research Center
Platformer
Politico
Politico EU
Power Line
Poynter
ProPublica
RAND Corporation
Radical with Amol Rajan
RealClearPolitics
Reason
Resolution Foundation
Rest of World
STAT News
Science Magazine
Semafor
Simon Willison
Sixth Tone
Sky Sports
Slow Boring
South China Morning Post
Spiegel International
Straits Times
Stratechery
Tablet Magazine
TechCrunch
The American Conservative
The Athletic
The Atlantic
The Block
The Commentary Magazine
The Conversation
The Critic
The Dispatch
The Economist
The Ezra Klein Show
The Federalist
The Free Press
The Guardian
The Independent
The Intercept
The Lancet
The National
The New York Times
The New Yorker
The News Agents
The Observer
The Pragmatic Engineer
The Rest Is Politics
The Slow Newscast
The Spectator US
The Telegraph
The Tim Ferriss Show
The Times
The Verge
Time
Tortoise Media
Triggernometry
UK Parliament
UN News
US Census Bureau
UnHerd
Vox
WHO
Wall Street Journal
War on the Rocks
Washington Examiner
Wired
World Bank
World Economic Forum
Yascha Mounk
Zeynep Tufekci
Nature, Published online: 23 June 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01955-1 Amid chaos in US science and geopolitical turmoil, Europe wants to position itself as a research haven — but questions about funding and innovation remain
This is the first international sale of Australia's advanced radar technology, which offers long-range surveillance to improve defences and provide early warning, the government said
Tesla is finally doing unsupervised robotaxi trips in Austin, Texas, according to a video posted on X. Elon Musk reposted the video, congratulating Tesla's AI team for the milestone. For months, Tesla's robotaxis in Austin and San Francisco have included safety monitors with access to a kill switch in case of emergency - a fallback […]
Like its AI policy, the Trump administration's AI team is taking shape on the fly. Why it matters: Departures among key White House officials, combined with rapid advances in technology, are shaking up who's taking the lead on AI policy in the administration. The big picture: Silicon Valley figures David Sacks and Siriam Krishnan have served as key architects of the administration's AI agenda. But with Sacks stepping back from day-to-day involvement and Krishnan preparing to leave, influence is shifting inside the White House to a broader group of officials and aides. Here's who's running the show — for now. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Lutnick's signature was on the letter that sparked the latest confrontation between Anthropic and the administration, ultimately leading to the takedown of the company's Fable and Mythos models. Last week, Lutnick imposed export controls on Anthropic, effectively creating a licensing regime that could eventually impact other AI labs.He is now leading meetings on the sidelines of the G7 to discuss expanding access to advanced AI models and standing next to President Trump during his summit press conference. While Lutnick brokers abroad, Chris Fall at Commerce's Center for AI Standards and Innovation has been holding technical meetings in D.C. Zoom in: Lutnick was once said to be on the outs for going off message in TV interviews and not having a solid handle over his department's jurisdiction, sources familiar with the matter said. But last week's Anthropic fallout put him back in the game and it's now Lutnick's moment."He's fixing a problem. He's not being a problem. And he's doing a great job," said one senior administration official following the letter imposing export controls. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Bessent does not directly oversee AI testing. Yet he was the point of contact when Amazon raised concerns about Anthropic safety issues and was among the few cabinet members flanking the president during a G7 press co
President Trump surprised tech CEOs by suddenly pushing the idea of the U.S. taking a small ownership stake in AI giants, so the American people share in the upside of what will be trillion-dollar companies. "There's something very interesting about it, where it almost becomes a partnership with the American public," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One yesterday. "It's like you make them [partners] in this revolution. It would be a beautiful thing. It would make 'em rich." Why it matters: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has pushed this idea with the Trump administration over the past year. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) reignited the conversation this week when he proposed giving the public a "direct ownership stake" in top AI companies via a one-time 50% tax, paid in stock. Of course, industry advocates of the idea would favor giving up much less for an AI public wealth fund — 1-5% stakes have been kicked around. Between the lines: AI is broadly unpopular in the U.S. Some industry leaders, and now clearly Trump, think the technology's image would improve if all Americans participated in this mind-boggling wealth creation. Ahead of the expected stock offerings by Anthropic, SpaceX and OpenAI, Trump said there's "so much money, and it's so big, that there are concepts where pieces could be given to the American public, where the American public essentially becomes a partner . with the companies." "We'll look into that," Trump said. "We're talking about it, where the American people can benefit from the success of AI. And by doing that, they're gonna like it better . We're leading China. We're leading everybody in the world with AI, and we want to keep it that way." The backstory: Altman has pushed the concept in private conversations with administration officials, then in a proposal for an AI New Deal, then on Capitol Hill this week when he visited Sanders and leaders of both parties. A "Public Wealth Fund" was one of the provocative ideas in OpenAI's "Industrial Policy for
Here is the draft executive order on cybersecurity and AI as it stood before President Trump pulled the plug on it Thursday. State of play: The industry and administration are scrambling to figure out what's next as key questions remain unanswered on the future of government access to top AI models and general AI safety
AI-driven scientific innovation accelerated in 2025 — fueling major progress in fields ranging from robotics to health care. Why it matters: Powerful new models and computing tools are influencing everything from how experiments are designed to how results are analyzed — with much of that momentum coming from the private sector. Here are some of 2025's biggest AI-driven breakthroughs: 1. Making diagnoses for Alzheimer's and related diseases is on the road to becoming faster and cheaper with AI. Researchers at a wide range of universities and health care institutions announced findings this year about how AI will help with future therapies and better detection in primary care.For example, one study found that a specific gene is a cause of Alzheimer's — a discovery the researchers were only able to make because AI helped them visualize the three-dimensional structure of the protein. 2. Google released its AlphaGenome model to understand diseases better and lead to drug discovery. The model was made possible by technical advancements that allow it to process long DNA sequences and provide quality predictions. 3. Advancements in humanoid robots' dexterity and human interaction this year could mean AI-enabled robots one day clean homes, keep people company, work in warehouses or provide care in <a href="https