मुख्य सामग्री पर जाएं

समाचार चर्चाएँ

विश्वसनीय पत्रकारिता से ट्रेंडिंग विषय, संरचित बहस में बदले गए। हमारी सामुदायिक चर्चाओं के विपरीत, ये स्वचालित रूप से ब्रेकिंग न्यूज़ से क्यूरेट किए जाते हैं ताकि समय पर, सूक्ष्म बातचीत को प्रेरित किया जा सके।

यह Explore से कैसे अलग है?

समाचार चर्चाएँ रीयल-टाइम में ट्रेंडिंग कहानियों से स्वचालित रूप से उत्पन्न होती हैं। Explore चर्चाएँ किसी भी विषय पर सामुदायिक द्वारा बनाए गए विषय दिखाती हैं। दोनों ही संरचित बहस प्रारूप का उपयोग करते हैं, लेकिन समाचार वर्तमान मामलों पर केंद्रित है।

हमारे समाचार स्रोत (156 विश्वसनीय आउटलेट)

हम संतुलित, गुणवत्तापूर्ण कवरेज सुनिश्चित करने के लिए इन प्रतिष्ठित स्रोतों से कहानियाँ एकत्रित करते हैं:

Acquired Podcast Africa Confidential Al Jazeera English Al Monitor All-In Podcast AllAfrica Americas Quarterly Andrew Sullivan Anne Applebaum Ars Technica Associated Press Axios BBC News BBC Sport BBC World Service Bloomberg Brookings Institution CSIS Caixin Global Carbon Brief Carnegie Endowment Cato Institute Channel NewsAsia Chartbook Chatham House Christianity Today City Journal Clean Energy Wire CoinDesk Columbia Journalism Review Commentary Magazine Commonweal Cory Doctorow Daily Maverick Daily Wire Decrypt Deutsche Welle Diary of a CEO E&E News ESPN El País América El País English Euractiv Eurostat Ezra Klein Farnam Street Financial Times First Things Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy France24 Francis Fukuyama Freddie deBoer Haaretz Hot Air Huberman Lab IEA IMF Ian Bremmer Institute for Fiscal Studies Institute for Government International Crisis Group Jonathan Rauch Law & Liberty Le Monde English Lex Fridman Podcast MIT Technology Review Mail & Guardian Manhattan Institute Marginal Revolution Matt Taibbi Modern Wisdom National Review Nature News New Statesman Nieman Lab Nikkei Asia Noahpinion Not Boring OECD Office for Budget Responsibility Office for National Statistics Our World in Data Paul Graham Pew Research Center Platformer Politico Politico EU Power Line Poynter ProPublica RAND Corporation Radical with Amol Rajan RealClearPolitics Reason Resolution Foundation Rest of World STAT News Science Magazine Semafor Simon Willison Sixth Tone Sky Sports Slow Boring South China Morning Post Spiegel International Straits Times Stratechery Tablet Magazine TechCrunch The American Conservative The Athletic The Atlantic The Block The Commentary Magazine The Conversation The Critic The Dispatch The Economist The Ezra Klein Show The Federalist The Free Press The Guardian The Independent The Intercept The Lancet The National The New York Times The New Yorker The News Agents The Observer The Pragmatic Engineer The Rest Is Politics The Slow Newscast The Spectator US The Telegraph The Tim Ferriss Show The Times The Verge Time Tortoise Media Triggernometry UK Parliament UN News US Census Bureau UnHerd Vox WHO Wall Street Journal War on the Rocks Washington Examiner Wired World Bank World Economic Forum Yascha Mounk Zeynep Tufekci
सभी विषयों पर वापस जाएँ
नवीनतम विषय के अनुसार Healthcare Environment Education Technology Economy Politics Society Infrastructure Geopolitics Business Culture
Geopolitics

What impact could foreign support for leaders like Orban have on democracy in other countries?

Vice President Vance on Tuesday will plunge into Europe's most volatile election in years — a Hungarian campaign engulfed by spy scandals, sabotage and unprecedented peril for MAGA's favorite foreign ally. Why it matters: Viktor Orbán is the cornerstone of President Trump's vision for Europe. The pro-Kremlin, anti-EU strongman has spent 16 years building a template for Christian nationalist rule now embraced by the American right. Trump's national security strategy openly calls for "cultivating resistance" in Europe by empowering nationalist forces like Orbán's. His defeat would shatter that model at its source. Zoom in: Vance arrives in Budapest with a clear mission: Boost Orbán as an indispensable U.S. ally in the fight against migration and the liberal European order. Orbán has led Hungary since 2010, systematically reshaping its courts, media and electoral maps to entrench his party's power — a playbook the European Parliament has called "electoral autocracy."His challenger, former ally Péter Magyar, has channeled voter anger over corruption and a struggling economy into the most serious threat to Orbán's rule in years. The big picture: Hungary's April 12 election is exposing a rare geopolitical convergence: The U.S. and Russia are both intervening to try to keep Orbán in power, while the EU and Ukraine are eager to see him gone. Washington: Trump's administration has made Orbán's survival a strategic priority — his government has served as both ideological inspiration and proof of concept for MAGA's vision of nationalist governance.Moscow: Orbán's government is Russia's most valuable ally inside both NATO and the EU — blocking Ukraine aid, vetoing sanctions and allegedly leaking sensitive information to Moscow.Brussels: No single member state has done more damage to EU unity than Hungary under Orbán. A Magyar victory would unlock billions in frozen EU funds and remove the bloc's most disruptive member overnight.Kyiv: Orbán has grown openly hostile to his war-to

Hungary
चर्चा में शामिल हों
Geopolitics

What do you think are the possible effects of military actions in Beirut on peace and safety in the region?

BEIRUT, March 12 (Reuters) - Israeli airstrikes hit a building twice in central Beirut less than a kilometre from the government headquarters, Reuters video footage showed on Thursday, shortly after the Israeli military said it had begun a new wave of strikes on the Lebanese capital. (Reporting by Maya Gebeily, Writing by Yomna Ehab, Editing by Timothy Heritage)

Israel
चर्चा में शामिल हों
Geopolitics

What should be done to reduce tensions between Israel, Hezbollah, and Iran to promote peace in the region?

Israel struck Beirut's southern suburbs Sunday in retaliation to a Hezbollah missile attack on northern Israel, Israeli officials said. Why it matters: Iran threatened last week to launch a missile attack against Israel if it attacks Beirut, while the U.S. has backed Israel's right to self-defence. Such a move could unravel U.S.–Iran negotiations and reignite the war. Israel notified the Trump administration before the strike, a U.S. official and two other sources with knowledge tell Axios."The United States supports Israel's right to self-defense and stands with the legitimate Government of Lebanon as it works to deliver a better future for its citizens," a U.S. official tells Axios. Hezbollah "must stop firing immediately and allow these agreements to take effect." Driving the news: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the strike answered Hezbollah missiles fired at northern Israel earlier Sunday, which the Israeli military says it intercepted. Israeli officials said the Beirut strike targeted a Hezbollah command center in Dahieh — a Shia district known as a Hezbollah stronghold. At least two people were killed and a dozen wounded, according to Lebanon's state news agency. Threat level: Senior Iranian lawmakers publicly threatened retaliation. Ebrahim Rezaei, a member of the Iranian parliament's national security committee, wrote on X that Iran "will give a decisive and painful response to the Zionist regime's attack on Dahieh."He told followers to "watch the skies" over Israel tonight.Iranian speaker of parliament and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf echoed that.Ghalibaf wrote on X: "They neither adhere to the ceasefire nor believe in dialogue, and with the naval blockade and violation of agreements on Lebanon, they showed that they only understand the language of force. The naval blockade against the Iranian nation and today's U.S. green light to the Zionist regime turn American and regime bases and assets in the region into legitimate targets

Israel
चर्चा में शामिल हों