Join conversations that matter to you
As remote work becomes mainstream, what's the right balance? We're discussing productivity, mental health, inequality, and the future of office spaces.
From the NHS and local councils to transport and policing, many public services in the UK are under intense pressure. Staff morale is low, waiting times are up, and citizens often feel short-changed despite record spending. With Rachel Reeves promising to make the UK “a country that works again,” the challenge isn’t just about funding — it’s about delivery, trust, and accountability. So what would really make the difference? Is it technology, leadership, local control, or culture change? How do we make public services work better — for both the people delivering them and the public who rely on them?
The UK economy faces a crossroads. Businesses argue the tax system has become too complex and unpredictable — while investors say the real bottleneck is access to long-term capital. Rachel Reeves has pledged to deliver “stability and growth,” but can she do both? Should her first Budget focus on simplifying and reforming the tax system — restoring confidence through clarity and fairness — or should she channel resources into unlocking investment, innovation, and scale-up capital? Where should the balance lie between fiscal discipline and bold economic stimulus?
A test discussion exploring different perspectives on climate action and environmental policy. This is sample data for testing the consensus clustering system.
As the new Chancellor prepares her first major Budget, founders, investors, and business leaders across the UK are watching closely. After years of policy uncertainty, many are hoping for a clear signal that Britain is serious about growth, innovation, and investment. What one policy change would make the biggest positive difference for you — whether you’re a startup founder, small business owner, or part of a scale-up trying to compete globally? Would you prioritise simplifying the tax system, boosting access to capital, or reviving incentives for risk-taking? Or should the focus shift toward long-term industrial strategy, green growth, or reforming how the government itself buys from SMEs? Share your perspective — what specific move from Rachel Reeves would count as a “win” for business, innovation, and the UK economy?
The UK government is considering proposals to reduce the annual allowance for Cash ISAs while encouraging more savings into Stocks & Shares ISAs. This would shift the emphasis from guaranteed savings products to investment-based products with market exposure. Key considerations include: Cash ISAs offer guaranteed returns and capital protection Stocks & Shares ISAs offer potentially higher returns but with investment risk Older savers and pensioners typically prefer cash-based savings for security Younger savers might benefit from long-term investment growth The current cost of living and economic uncertainty affects risk tolerance We're gathering perspectives on whether this potential policy change would benefit savers, what concerns people have, and how it might affect different age groups and financial situations. Share your thoughts on how changes to ISA allowances might impact your savings strategy and financial securit
Just 10% of offenders are responsible for at least half of all crime in Britain. These career criminals are guilty of dozens or even hundreds of offences but our courts are routinely giving them short sentences - or letting them avoid prison altogether.
Politicians in many countries are looking at taxing unrealized capital gains.
In Singapore, the salaries for politicians are notably high. The Prime Minister earns S$2.2 million annually, while the President receives S$1.54 million. An entry-level minister has a salary of S$1.1 million, and an elected Member of Parliament (MP) earns an allowance of S$192,500 per year