Search Statements

Many parents use smartphones to keep their children safe by being able to reach them at any time. How do we balance that with limiting use?

If we take away smartphones, how do we teach children to navigate the digital world safely?

A smartphone-free childhood means more opportunities for kids to use their imagination and build real-world skills.

Isn't it better to teach children to use technology responsibly rather than banning it outright?

Smartphones are harmful because they lead to screen addiction, causing children to miss out on real-life interactions.

Banning smartphones completely might isolate children from their peers, especially since so many use them for communication.

Children need to play outside, explore, and be creative. Smartphones take away from these important aspects of childhood.

they need to bring direct benefit to the communities they are apart of rather than to just a few who run them

Charge everyone £10 for every “new” course of treatment or appointment to encourage people to attend appointments and reduce time wasted

Users should be better educated about evaluating the reliability of information.

Self-regulation is the best approach for social media companies.

Social media platforms shouldn't profit from sensational or harmful content.

Social media platforms need stricter rules on privacy and data collection.

False information should be labeled but not censored.

Social media companies are private businesses and should set their own rules.

Social media's influence on politics is concerning and should be limited.

Regulating social media would be too difficult to enforce effectively.

Social media has a duty to create a safe environment for all users.

Platforms should ban accounts that spread harmful misinformation.

Fact-checking content infringes on freedom of expression.