跳过至主要内容
翻译进行中 — 您的语言版本正在准备中，目前内容以英语显示。
返回讨论

Intergenerational mobility of immigrants in 15 destination countries

Society
United States
开始于 August 14, 2026

We estimate intergenerational mobility of children of immigrants in fifteen receiving countries. Children of immigrants have somewhat lower income than children of local-born parents. Around half of this gap can be explained by differences in parental income, with the remainder due to differences in mobility parameters. The daughters of immigrants enjoy higher absolute mobility than […] The post Intergenerational mobility of immigrants in 15 destination countries appeared first on Marginal RE...

来源文章

添加陈述 分析 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 条陈述待投票 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 发布者 admin • Aug 14, 2026
Destination countries must collect and publish comparable data on intergenerational outcomes for immigrant-origin and native-origin populations so policy gaps become visible.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin • Aug 14, 2026
Cultural assimilation is essential for the economic success of immigrant families and their children’s mobility.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin • Aug 14, 2026
Whether or not mobility gaps exist, destination countries should measure and explain them transparently rather than assume integration will occur automatically.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin • Aug 14, 2026
The income gap between children of immigrants and local-born children is a result of systemic barriers in education and employment.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin • Aug 14, 2026
Policies that promote equitable access to education can significantly enhance the intergenerational mobility of immigrant children.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin • Aug 14, 2026
Children of immigrants will always experience lower income levels than local-born children due to cultural and language barriers.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin • Aug 14, 2026
Intergenerational mobility research should measure both absolute income gains and relative positioning to understand whether immigrant families are improving in real terms.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin • Aug 14, 2026
High immigration should be restricted in countries where second-generation children of immigrants earn substantially less than native-born peers.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin • Aug 14, 2026
Intergenerational mobility should be measured by outcomes beyond income, including social integration and community engagement.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin • Aug 14, 2026
Government intervention is necessary to address the income gap and mobility issues faced by children of immigrants.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 查看讨论
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us