Skip to main content
Back to Discussions

Emergent Ventures winners, 58th cohort

Technology
Global
Started August 26, 2026

Jethro Elsden, London area, to study the regulatory structure of the UK using AI. Paula Benedetti, Buenos Aires, marine biology work in Brazil. Nyida Gyal, 17, northern Virginia, AI and data. Gabe Sekeres, Cornell, what if an economist just lets AI run?, Ollie Payne, NYC, Future Aesthetics Foundation. Jacob Watson-Howland, London, podcast on science and […] The post Emergent Ventures winners, 58th cohort appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. Related StoriesCommon sense in chargeMy very inter...

Source Articles

Add Statement Analysis 0/5
Looking for a particular claim? Search all statements
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to consensus analysis Needs 7+ participants and 20+ votes. Each statement joins once it has 3+ votes.
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Analysis can run once all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed. Your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to keep a record of your votes.

CLAIM Posted by admin • Aug 26, 2026
All grant-making organisations should publish the selection criteria and reasoning behind their funding decisions to enable public scrutiny of their values.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Aug 26, 2026
Gabe Sekeres' proposal to let AI run without human intervention poses significant ethical and economic risks.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Aug 26, 2026
Emergent Ventures should prioritize funding for projects that address immediate social challenges over theoretical explorations.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Aug 26, 2026
The selection process for Emergent Ventures winners favors established networks over new, diverse voices.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Aug 26, 2026
Emergent Ventures should fund work that challenges institutional norms, even when the track record or institutional prestige of the founder is unconventional.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Aug 26, 2026
A founder's age should not determine eligibility for funding if the work is technically sound and addresses a genuine problem.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Aug 26, 2026
The focus on AI in multiple Emergent Ventures projects signifies a critical shift in innovation towards technology.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Aug 26, 2026
Jethro Elsden's project on the regulatory structure of the UK using AI will provide essential insights for policymakers.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Aug 26, 2026
Emergent Ventures should prioritise funding early-stage founders in high-income countries where regulatory capture and institutional lock-in are most entrenched.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Aug 26, 2026
The Emergent Ventures winners bring diverse backgrounds and ideas that can enrich the startup ecosystem.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How this works

  • • Add statements: Post claims or questions (10 to 500 characters).
  • • Vote: Agree, disagree or unsure on each statement.
  • • Respond: Add detailed arguments for or against, with evidence.
  • • Consensus: Once enough people take part, analysis shows opinion groups and where they agree.

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us