翻訳中 — お使いの言語版を準備している間、このコンテンツは英語で表示されています。

ディスカッションに戻る

ディスカッションを保存

サインインして保存して更新を取得してください。

Rising concentration for economics awards

Economy

グローバル

October 06, 2026に開始

We analyze the academic affiliations of nearly 6,000 award-winning researchers in 18 major fields in the natural sciences, engineering, and social sciences from the 1820s to the 2020s, focusing on the 1960s onward. The analysis reveals a trend of declining concentration in the institutional affiliations of award-winning researchers, shifting from a few science-strong universities in […] The post Rising concentration for economics awards appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsInteresti...

ソース記事

Rising concentration for economics awards

Marginal Revolution (United States) | Oct 06, 2026

主張を追加分析 0/5

並び替え：

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.

🗳️ Join the conversation

10 投票すべき主張 • Your perspective shapes the analysis

📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement

Participants 0/7

Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10

Total Votes 0/20

💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 06, 2026

Concentration in economics awards reflects the quality and impact of research produced by top institutions.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 06, 2026

Award-giving bodies should actively track and publicly report the geographic and institutional diversity of their recipients to maintain legitimacy.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 06, 2026

Efforts to diversify the pool of award-winning economists could dilute the perceived value of these accolades.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 06, 2026

Award committees should use blind review or randomized selection methods to test whether institutional affiliation actually influences economics prize decisions.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 06, 2026

Dispersing economics awards across more institutions would dilute their value and incentivize awarding based on institutional affiliation rather than merit.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 06, 2026

The selection process for economics awards must prioritize merit over institutional affiliation to foster genuine progress.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 06, 2026

Major economics awards should be distributed more equitably to encourage innovation across a wider range of institutions.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 06, 2026

Awards in economics should be scrutinized for their influence on research funding and academic careers.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 06, 2026

The concentration of awards in economics is a symptom of systemic biases favoring established institutions.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 06, 2026

Economics as a field has become intellectually narrower because award concentration reinforces methodological and theoretical homogeneity among recognized scholars.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

• Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
• Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
• Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
• Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.