メインコンテンツに移動
翻訳中 — お使いの言語版を準備している間、このコンテンツは英語で表示されています。
ディスカッションに戻る

On *Stubborn Attachments* and religion (from my email)

Culture
United States
October 09, 2026に開始

Hey Tyler I consider Stubborn Attachments your most dogmatic and religious book. Pondering on it, here are my Abrahamic readings of it: Jewish: Ten Commandments, obviously. While the bigger canon of Jewish laws tend to be overly conservative because people will fail following them anyway, the Ten Commandments are the laws the Jews should be […] The post On *Stubborn Attachments* and religion (from my email) appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to Confused on Ten Commandment...

ソース記事

主張を追加 分析 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 投票すべき主張 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 09, 2026
Whether grounded in revelation or reason, principles claiming to guide civilisation must explain how they handle conflicting goods and tragic trade-offs.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 09, 2026
Stubborn Attachments should not be interpreted solely through a religious lens, as it can be appreciated in a secular context.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 09, 2026
Stubborn Attachments presents a dogmatic view of ethics that aligns closely with religious moral frameworks.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 09, 2026
Stubborn Attachments succeeds precisely because it abandons religious language while preserving the binding force that makes moral rules durable.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 09, 2026
Ethical commitments discussed in Stubborn Attachments can coexist with diverse religious beliefs and traditions.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 09, 2026
The comparison to the Ten Commandments is apt because both sets of rules prioritise constraint over permission as a path to human welfare.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 09, 2026
Whether a moral framework is religious or secular, its core claims about human flourishing should be tested against evidence and lived experience.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 09, 2026
Religious principles should inform the ethical discussions in Stubborn Attachments to foster a sense of community.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 09, 2026
Religious moral systems derive legitimacy from revelation or tradition; secular philosophies claiming comparable authority must earn it through argument alone.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Oct 09, 2026
The teachings of Stubborn Attachments can be misinterpreted as promoting a singular religious worldview.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us