번역 진행 중 — 귀하의 언어 버전을 준비하는 동안 이 콘텐츠가 영어로 표시됩니다.

토론으로 돌아가기

로그인하여 저장하고 업데이트를 받으세요.

On Stubborn Attachments and religion (from my email)

Culture

United States

October 09, 2026에 시작됨

Hey Tyler I consider Stubborn Attachments your most dogmatic and religious book. Pondering on it, here are my Abrahamic readings of it: Jewish: Ten Commandments, obviously. While the bigger canon of Jewish laws tend to be overly conservative because people will fail following them anyway, the Ten Commandments are the laws the Jews should be […] The post On *Stubborn Attachments* and religion (from my email) appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to Confused on Ten Commandment...

출처 기사

On *Stubborn Attachments* and religion (from my email)

Marginal Revolution (United States) | Oct 09, 2026

진술 추가 분석 0/5

정렬 기준:

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.

🗳️ Join the conversation

10 투표할 진술 • Your perspective shapes the analysis

📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement

Participants 0/7

Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10

Total Votes 0/20

💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Oct 09, 2026

Whether grounded in revelation or reason, principles claiming to guide civilisation must explain how they handle conflicting goods and tragic trade-offs.

번역 대기 중

💬 토론 보기

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Oct 09, 2026

Stubborn Attachments should not be interpreted solely through a religious lens, as it can be appreciated in a secular context.

번역 대기 중

💬 토론 보기

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Oct 09, 2026

Stubborn Attachments presents a dogmatic view of ethics that aligns closely with religious moral frameworks.

번역 대기 중

💬 토론 보기

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Oct 09, 2026

Stubborn Attachments succeeds precisely because it abandons religious language while preserving the binding force that makes moral rules durable.

번역 대기 중

💬 토론 보기

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Oct 09, 2026

Ethical commitments discussed in Stubborn Attachments can coexist with diverse religious beliefs and traditions.

번역 대기 중

💬 토론 보기

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Oct 09, 2026

The comparison to the Ten Commandments is apt because both sets of rules prioritise constraint over permission as a path to human welfare.

번역 대기 중

💬 토론 보기

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Oct 09, 2026

Whether a moral framework is religious or secular, its core claims about human flourishing should be tested against evidence and lived experience.

번역 대기 중

💬 토론 보기

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Oct 09, 2026

Religious principles should inform the ethical discussions in Stubborn Attachments to foster a sense of community.

번역 대기 중

💬 토론 보기

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Oct 09, 2026

Religious moral systems derive legitimacy from revelation or tradition; secular philosophies claiming comparable authority must earn it through argument alone.

번역 대기 중

💬 토론 보기

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 게시자: admin • Oct 09, 2026

The teachings of Stubborn Attachments can be misinterpreted as promoting a singular religious worldview.

번역 대기 중

💬 토론 보기

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

• Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
• Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
• Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
• Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.