Skip to main content
Back to Discussions

I guest host the NYT podcast and interview Dwarkesh

Technology
United States
Started October 16, 2026

Here is the audio, video, and transcript. Excerpt: Cowen: Unreleased models — why are they important? Patel: As in the ones that are internal to the companies? Cowen: Well, many companies have unreleased models. Maybe it would cost too much to release them or they’re not safe yet, but the public doesn’t see them. Patel: […] The post I guest host the NYT podcast and interview Dwarkesh appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. Commentswhat a treat by ParkerRelated StoriesWhy I do not use LLMs more...

Source Articles

Add Statement Analysis 0/5
Looking for a particular claim? Search all statements
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to consensus analysis Needs 7+ participants and 20+ votes. Each statement joins once it has 3+ votes.
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Analysis can run once all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed. Your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to keep a record of your votes.

CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 16, 2026
Releasing unreleased models could compromise proprietary information and innovation.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 16, 2026
Engaging in public discourse about unreleased models is essential for informed citizenry.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 16, 2026
The public deserves access to unreleased models used by tech companies for transparency.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 16, 2026
A balance must be struck between innovation and the public's right to understand technology's impact.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 16, 2026
The conversation about unreleased models should include both safety concerns and public interest.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 16, 2026
Focusing on unreleased models distracts from the more pressing issues of data privacy and ethical AI use.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 16, 2026
The implications of unreleased models should be evaluated through a collaborative discussion involving experts and the public.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 16, 2026
The debate over unreleased models is often driven by fear rather than factual evidence.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 16, 2026
Discussing unreleased models can enhance public trust in technology and its developers.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 16, 2026
Tech companies should be required to disclose the criteria used in their unreleased models.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How this works

  • • Add statements: Post claims or questions (10 to 500 characters).
  • • Vote: Agree, disagree or unsure on each statement.
  • • Respond: Add detailed arguments for or against, with evidence.
  • • Consensus: Once enough people take part, analysis shows opinion groups and where they agree.

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us