Skip to main content
Back to Discussions

I guest host an NYT podcast with Michael Kratsios, Trump science advisor

Technology
United States
Started October 24, 2026

Here is the audio, video, and transcript. Here is one excerpt: Cowen: Talk me out of this worry: So we agree science is an ecosystem, and there’s always a temptation to want to fund the most dynamic, most productive parts of the ecosystem. And right now, that would probably be A.I. But if you need […] The post I guest host an NYT podcast with Michael Kratsios, Trump science advisor appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. Related StoriesWill bystander economies be able to finance their governme...

Source Articles

Add Statement Analysis 0/5
Looking for a particular claim? Search all statements
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to consensus analysis Needs 7+ participants and 20+ votes. Each statement joins once it has 3+ votes.
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Analysis can run once all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed. Your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to keep a record of your votes.

CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 24, 2026
Michael Kratsios' role as a science advisor under Trump has significantly influenced the direction of U.S. science policy.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 24, 2026
Science should not be politicized, and discussions must remain focused on empirical evidence and research integrity.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 24, 2026
Guest hosting a podcast with a controversial figure like Michael Kratsios can alienate certain audiences.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 24, 2026
Science funding decisions should prioritize transparency and public engagement to build trust in the scientific process.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 24, 2026
The scientific community should actively engage in dialogues that include diverse political perspectives to foster understanding.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 24, 2026
Funding should be diversified across various scientific fields, not just concentrated on AI.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 24, 2026
Guest hosting an NYT podcast raises the profile of important science topics in a politically charged environment.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 24, 2026
The podcast provides a valuable platform for discussing the implications of political decisions on scientific research.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 24, 2026
Public trust in science is eroded when science advisors are perceived as politically biased.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 24, 2026
Public discussions about science funding must address both immediate technological needs and long-term scientific diversity.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How this works

  • • Add statements: Post claims or questions (10 to 500 characters).
  • • Vote: Agree, disagree or unsure on each statement.
  • • Respond: Add detailed arguments for or against, with evidence.
  • • Consensus: Once enough people take part, analysis shows opinion groups and where they agree.

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us