Skip to main content

Why are cybersecurity losses not worse?

Technology
United States
Started October 25, 2026

Here’s the first part of my theory: cybercriminals are not the organized geniuses we implicitly imagine. Anyone building a criminal gang has to find candidates willing to forgo more stable opportunities in the formal economy. My modeling estimated that something like 720,000 people are involved in the online criminal economy, 90% of them in scam […] The post Why are cybersecurity losses not worse? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. Related StoriesCybersecurity ETFPodcast with Rabbi David ...

Source Articles

Looking for a particular claim? Search all statements
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to consensus analysis Needs 7+ participants and 20+ votes. Each statement joins once it has 3+ votes.
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Analysis can run once all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed. Your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to keep a record of your votes.

CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 25, 2026
Cybersecurity losses are actually severe and growing, but remain hidden because victims underreport breaches and the full economic damage goes untracked.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 25, 2026
The 720,000-person criminal economy is already massive and represents a drain on society that regulations and enforcement should prioritize disrupting.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 25, 2026
Cybercriminals are far more organized and capable than most organizations give them credit for, and losses appear modest only because we measure them poorly.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 25, 2026
Cyber losses would accelerate exponentially if criminal supply chains became as efficient and specialized as legitimate corporate supply chains.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 25, 2026
Most cybercriminals are opportunists rather than highly organized geniuses, which limits their impact.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 25, 2026
Cybercriminal income thresholds and career stability differences explain loss patterns better than arguments about adversary competence or incompetence.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 25, 2026
Cybersecurity losses are mitigated by the increasing investment in security technologies by businesses.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 25, 2026
Scams dominate cybercrime activity because they require minimal technical skill and scale easily, not because sophisticated attacks are impossible.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 25, 2026
Governments should impose stricter penalties on cybercriminals to deter potential offenders and reduce losses.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Oct 25, 2026
Understanding criminal labor constraints and skill gaps is necessary for effective cybersecurity policy regardless of which defenses we ultimately prioritize.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How this works

  • • Add statements: Post claims or questions (10 to 500 characters).
  • • Vote: Agree, disagree or unsure on each statement.
  • • Respond: Add detailed arguments for or against, with evidence.
  • • Consensus: Once enough people take part, analysis shows opinion groups and where they agree.

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us