Skip to main content
翻訳中 — お使いの言語版を準備している間、このコンテンツは英語で表示されています。
Back to Discussions

My Conversation with Andrew Ross Sorkin

Economy
United States
Started February 05, 2026

This was great fun for me, here is the audio, video, and transcript. Here is part of the episode summary: Tyler and Andrew debate whether those 1929 stock prices were justified, what Fed and policy choices might have prevented the Depression, whether Glass-Steagall was built on a flawed premises, what surprised Andrew most about the […] The post My Conversation with Andrew Ross Sorkin appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsThis is one of the best conversations qua conversation in a . ...

Source Articles

主張を追加 分析 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 投票すべき主張 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 投稿者： will • Feb 05, 2026
Examining what surprised Andrew about the economic landscape highlights the need for ongoing adaptation in our understanding of financial markets.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： will • Feb 05, 2026
The conversation reinforces that historical economic events, like the Great Depression, should inform current policy decisions to avoid repeating mistakes.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： will • Feb 05, 2026
Blaming the Federal Reserve's policies for the Great Depression oversimplifies the multitude of factors that contributed to the economic collapse.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： will • Feb 05, 2026
The discussion on Glass-Steagall raises important questions about the balance between regulation and market freedom in preventing financial crises.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： will • Feb 05, 2026
The debate over 1929 stock prices illustrates the complexities of market valuation and the inherent unpredictability of economic bubbles.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us