Skip to main content
Back to Discussions

Position: Human Baselines in Model Evaluations Need Rigor and Transparency

Technology
Global
Started February 07, 2026

We argue that human baselines in foundation model evaluations must be more rigorous and more transparent to enable meaningful comparisons of human vs. AI performance, and we provide recommendations and a reporting checklist towards this end

Source Articles

Add Statement Analysis 0/5
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 07, 2026
Implementing rigorous human baselines in AI evaluations will ensure more accurate comparisons, enhancing trust in AI systems and their decision-making.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 07, 2026
Greater rigor in human baseline evaluations will highlight areas where AI can surpass human performance, driving advancements in technology.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 07, 2026
While transparency in AI evaluations is important, the focus should also be on the adaptability of AI systems to different contexts and challenges.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 07, 2026
Overemphasizing human baselines may hinder innovation in AI development, as it could restrict the exploration of unconventional AI capabilities.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Feb 07, 2026
The call for transparency in model evaluations may complicate the evaluation process, making it less efficient and more bureaucratic.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement