另一种可能的网络平衡?(摘自我的邮件)
I would not wish to bet on this, but it is an interesting idea: I wonder if the cyber capabilities of Mythos and future models ultimately lower the returns to ‘hacking,’ perhaps below the point where such efforts are worth investing in. Say you’re a nefarious actor and uncover a critical, zero-day exploit in an […] The post Another possible cyberequilibrium? (from my email) appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsFor some exploits, you only need to get in once. Your process . by AI Guy...
来源文章
Marginal Revolution (United States) | 2026年4月12日
您的投票很重要
无需账号。您的投票会被保存并计入共识分析。 创建账号即可保存您的投票记录。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Lower returns on hacking could embolden hackers to innovate, leading to more sophisticated attacks rather than a decrease in cyber threats.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Investing in advanced cyber capabilities should be prioritized, as they could redefine the cost-benefit analysis behind hacking for malicious actors.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
If hacking becomes less rewarding, it could lead to a false sense of security, making organizations more vulnerable to new threats.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The rise of advanced cyber capabilities may deter nefarious hacking, ultimately reducing cybercrime and enhancing security for all.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The concept of cyberequilibrium suggests a complex balance between cybersecurity advancements and hacking activities that merits further exploration.
💡 使用说明
- • 添加陈述: 发布观点或问题(10 至 500 个字符)。
- • 投票: 对每条陈述选择同意、不同意或不确定。
- • 回应: 附上证据,详细阐述支持或反对的理由。
- • 共识: 参与人数足够后,分析会显示各意见群体及其共识所在。
Society Speaks 开放且独立。 您的支持让公民讨论远离广告和商业影响。
支持我们