メインコンテンツに移動
ディスカッションに戻る

In Development誌で

Economy
グローバル
April 17, 2026に開始

A new venture, focusing on evidence-based approaches to economic development globally. Here is Paul Niehaus on GiveDirectly and the evidence for cash-based transfers. Here is the home page and a link to subscribe. The post In Development magazine appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to Phil S. In place of studying empirically, maybe . by BCIn reply to Phil S. One faggot I met said we want a wall. by Art Deco“[An RCT] almost died in—of all places—ethics review: . by BCIf Giv...

ソース記事

主張を追加 分析 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 投票すべき主張 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 投稿者： will • Apr 17, 2026
GiveDirectlyのような現金ベースの給付は個人の力を与え、発展途上地域における持続可能な経済成長につながる可能性がある。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

Cash-based transfers, like those used by GiveDirectly, empower individuals and can lead to sustainable economic growth in developing regions.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： will • Apr 17, 2026
経済開発におけるエビデンスに基づくアプローチは受け入れるべきだが、その実施と結果について批判的であり続けなければならない。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

Evidence-based approaches in economic development should be embraced, but we must remain critical of their implementation and outcomes.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： will • Apr 17, 2026
現金給付の有効性は文脈に左右される。ある地域で機能する方法は別の地域には適用できない可能性があり、普遍的な採用を複雑にしている。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

The effectiveness of cash transfers depends on context; what works in one region may not be applicable in another, complicating universal adoption.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： will • Apr 17, 2026
直接的な現金給付への投資は、行政コストを大幅に削減し、援助配分の効率性を向上させることができる。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

Investing in direct cash transfers can significantly reduce administrative costs and improve efficiency in aid distribution.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者： will • Apr 17, 2026
現金給付への依存は経済の構造的問題を見落とし、貧困への長期的な解決策を生み出すことができない。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

Relying on cash transfers may overlook the structural issues in economies, failing to create long-term solutions for poverty.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 ディスカッションを見る
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us