Skip to main content
Retour aux discussions

Le chômage technologique dans la Grande-Bretagne victorienne

Economy
United Kingdom
Commencé April 22, 2026

We do not know whether technological unemployment swept across England in the wake of the British Industrial Revolution. In this paper, I propose an approach to quantify jobs lost to, and created by, creative destruction in the 19th century. Using over 170 million individual records from the full-count British census (1851–1911), I generate sub-industry “task” […] The post Technological unemployment in Victorian Britain appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to Steve Sailer. ...

Articles sources

Ajouter une affirmation Analyse 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 affirmations à voter • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Publié par will • Apr 22, 2026
Se concentrer uniquement sur la perte d'emplois due au changement technologique ignore la destruction créatrice qui mène finalement à la croissance économique.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

Focusing solely on job loss from technological change ignores the creative destruction that ultimately leads to economic growth.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Apr 22, 2026
La relation entre la technologie et l'emploi au XIXe siècle est complexe et mérite une analyse nuancée pour éclairer les politiques modernes.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

The relationship between technology and employment in the 19th century is complex and warrants a nuanced analysis to inform modern policies.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Apr 22, 2026
Comprendre la dynamique de l'emploi dans la Grande-Bretagne victorienne peut fournir des perspectives précieuses sur les débats actuels concernant l'automatisation et les déplacements d'emplois.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

Understanding job dynamics in Victorian Britain can provide valuable insights into current debates on automation and job displacement.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Apr 22, 2026
L'étude du chômage technologique dans la Grande-Bretagne victorienne révèle des leçons essentielles sur l'impact de l'innovation sur les marchés du travail d'aujourd'hui.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

The study of technological unemployment in Victorian Britain reveals critical lessons about the impact of innovation on labor markets today.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Apr 22, 2026
Quantifier la perte d'emplois au XIXe siècle occulte les avantages sociétaux plus larges du progrès technologique pendant la Révolution industrielle.
Traduit par IA · Voir l'original

Quantifying job loss in the 19th century overlooks the broader societal benefits of technological advancement during the Industrial Revolution.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us