주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기
번역 진행 중 — 귀하의 언어 버전을 준비하는 동안 이 콘텐츠가 영어로 표시됩니다.
토론으로 돌아가기

Can liberals be pacifists?

Culture
글로벌
May 27, 2026에 시작됨

This is mostly a podcast about Benjamin Britten, and in particular his War Requiem, with Rebecca Lowe (former singer and conductor, in addition to philosopher and also her current role at Mercatus). Here is the YouTube, here is the transcript and further listening links. Excerpt: LOWE: Yeah, so we should think about what it means for […] The post Can liberals be pacifists? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsSince you're going to be interviewing Martha Nussbaum, it . by JWCWhat abo...

출처 기사

진술 추가 분석 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 투표할 진술 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 게시자: will • May 27, 2026
The complexities of modern warfare challenge the idea that liberals can be true pacifists, as sometimes force is necessary to protect vulnerable populations.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • May 27, 2026
Pacifism within liberalism raises questions about moral responsibility, particularly when inaction can lead to greater harm.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • May 27, 2026
A liberal pacifist stance can inspire art and culture, as seen in Britten's War Requiem, highlighting the emotional depth of anti-war messages.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • May 27, 2026
Critics argue that liberal pacifism risks naivety, as it may ignore the realities of oppressive regimes that require a more assertive response.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • May 27, 2026
Liberals can effectively embrace pacifism, as it aligns with their values of human rights and social justice, promoting peaceful conflict resolution.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us